Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
@Ali-7800 can you take a look this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@cuicw can you describe how you used the lumped mass method? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Looking at your plot it seems your catenary is 300m long while ours is only 1m long. How are you exactly comparing the two results? Are you matching the same properties between the two programs such as density, elastic modulus, radius, etc? or are you doing some sort of scaling? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I tried to run the catenary program, and I compared it with the distribution of the data obtained by the lumped mass method. It was found that the value of internal _ forces seemed to be unreasonable. As shown in the following figure, the value of the endpoint seems to be much larger than the value of the intermediate node.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions