You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, twelve-tone asks the user to use the following notation to get a particular row form from the randomly generated run:
twelve-tone -r 2 -c 3
I'm proposing that instead we used the notation that composers are used to when they learn this stuff in school/theory classes/etc.
This would also reduce the amount of input that a user has to type at the CLI interface:
twelve-tone ri versus twelve-tone -r 2 -c 3. The latter seems too verbose of a CLI interface for getting a row form in my humble opinion.
The following gives you the retrograde-inversion from a randomly generated twelve-tone matrix.
twelve-tone ri
or
twelve-tone RI
Additionally passing in the "generator" note from which the matrix is created would be cool.
The following would get you the retrograde-inversion from the twelve-tone matrix based off of a G note.
twelve-tone G ri
or
twelve-tone G RI
I have not mentioned how we would handle accidentals in this issue but there are a few approaches we can take.
The idea would be to have p, i, r, and ri and subcommands for the CLI.
That is, prime, inversion, retrograde, and retrograde-inversion row forms as subcommands that can be passed in to the CLI of twelve-tone in order to choose the row form that you want to retrieve.
Hey @jgarte I love this idea and agree that the API should reflect the composers mindset.
I think most of these operations should be fairly straightforward to implement - I might take a stab at it towards the end of the month, although if anyone else is interested in the meantime, feel free to send a patch!
Currently,
twelve-tone
asks the user to use the following notation to get a particular row form from the randomly generated run:twelve-tone -r 2 -c 3
I'm proposing that instead we used the notation that composers are used to when they learn this stuff in school/theory classes/etc.
This would also reduce the amount of input that a user has to type at the CLI interface:
twelve-tone ri
versustwelve-tone -r 2 -c 3
. The latter seems too verbose of a CLI interface for getting a row form in my humble opinion.The following gives you the retrograde-inversion from a randomly generated twelve-tone matrix.
twelve-tone ri
or
twelve-tone RI
Additionally passing in the "generator" note from which the matrix is created would be cool.
The following would get you the retrograde-inversion from the twelve-tone matrix based off of a G note.
twelve-tone G ri
or
twelve-tone G RI
I have not mentioned how we would handle accidentals in this issue but there are a few approaches we can take.
The idea would be to have
p
,i
,r
, andri
and subcommands for the CLI.That is, prime, inversion, retrograde, and retrograde-inversion row forms as subcommands that can be passed in to the CLI of
twelve-tone
in order to choose the row form that you want to retrieve.@accraze WDYT
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: