Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rocketmq-replicator] RmqMetaReplicator Initialize DefaultMQAdminExt exception #857

Open
Slideee opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Slideee
Copy link

Slideee commented Jan 18, 2022

The issue tracker is ONLY used for bug report and feature request.

Any question or RocketMQ proposal please use our mailing lists.

BUG REPORT

  1. Please describe the issue you observed:
  • What did you do (The steps to reproduce)?

  • What did you expect to see?

  • What did you see instead?

  1. Please tell us about your environment:

  2. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, suggestions how to fix, etc):

FEATURE REQUEST

  1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.

  2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.

  3. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?

  4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:

  • sub-task1-issue-number: sub-task1 description here,
  • sub-task2-issue-number: sub-task2 description here,
  • ...
    image
    image
    The location of the configValid parameter assignment is wrong, it should be above the prepare() method, which causes DefaultMQAdminExt to fail to initialize normally

image
WorkDirectTask put position error

@odbozhou
Copy link
Contributor

rocketmq-connect already has an independent repository, you can go to this repository to submit PR, issue.
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-connect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants