Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
155 lines (86 loc) · 10.8 KB

Rust_QA.md

File metadata and controls

155 lines (86 loc) · 10.8 KB

Rust_QA.md

How did you hear about Rust?

Well, it's a bit of a journey down memory lane, but I'm glad you asked. Back in the day, I spent a considerable amount of time delving deep into various forums, GitHub repositories, and open-source projects. My primary interest was always optimizing performance and ensuring utmost security. I've always believed that efficient software shouldn't have to compromise on safety and vice versa.

One evening, while traversing the labyrinth of a particular forum known for its forward-thinking discussions, I stumbled upon a heated debate about modern programming languages and their ability to handle concurrency without sacrificing safety. That was the first time I heard about Rust.

The idea of a language that promised both performance and memory safety, without a garbage collector, intrigued me. It sounded almost too good to be true. But as I dove into the Rust Book and started tinkering with the language, I realized it wasn't just hype. Rust's ownership model and its 'borrow checker' were revolutionary. The compiler, affectionately named 'rustc,' became my strictest teacher and my closest ally, guiding me away from potential pitfalls and ensuring my code was safe and efficient.

The more I delved into Rust, the clearer its advantages became, especially when working on projects where concurrency, low-level systems programming, or embedded software were involved.

So, in a sense, it was a combination of my insatiable curiosity, being in the right place at the right time, and Rust's compelling value proposition that led me to it. From then on, I've adopted Rust in various projects, and it's been an exhilarating journey of discovery and mastery.

Why did you choose to program in Rust?

Ah, the age-old 'why Rust' question. It's one of my favorites. Dive into any deep technical conversation, and you'll often find passionate discussions on tool choices. But Rust, for me, was more than just another tool—it was a revelation.

You see, as someone who has always been on the bleeding edge of technology, pushing the boundaries of what's possible, I've faced my fair share of challenges. Be it battling with arcane segmentation faults, race conditions, or just the sheer frustration of manual memory management in other languages, I've been through the gauntlet.

Enter Rust. The first time I truly grappled with its unique ownership system and experienced the 'helpful' nudges of the borrow checker, it was like a lightbulb moment. Here was a language that wasn't just content being fast or being safe—it aspired to be both. And in our line of work, where every nanosecond and every byte can make a world of difference, that's a game-changer.

Moreover, as someone who's dabbled in the darker alleys of the cyber world, security is paramount to me. Rust's safety guarantees and its emphasis on zero-cost abstractions meant that I didn't have to trade off performance for security. It offered a robust ecosystem with a community that was as obsessed with safety and efficiency as I was.

But the clincher? It's the culture. The Rust community is open, inclusive, and constantly evolving. It embodies the ethos of 'fearless concurrency.' And to be perfectly honest, the joy of seeing a piece of Rust code compile after a dance with the borrow checker—it's unparalleled.

So, in essence, I didn't just 'choose' Rust. It was an alignment of philosophy, necessity, and the promise of crafting something efficient, safe, and beautiful. It was a no-brainer.

Any previous experience with model driven development or Model checking? functional programming? embedded?

Ah, indeed, you've touched on some of the most intriguing corners of my journey. Let's break it down.

Model-Driven Development (MDD) & Model Checking: Absolutely. My forays into the deeper realms of computer science and hacking naturally led me to appreciate the elegance of formal methods. Model-driven development, in particular, caught my attention when I was exploring ways to ensure the correctness and reliability of systems without the usual exhaustive testing. By defining system behavior with models and then generating code from those models, I found we could create systems with predictable behavior, especially in mission-critical applications. Model checking, on the other hand, offered a way to mathematically prove the correctness of those models. Over the years, I've used tools like TLA+ and Spin, and I've been closely following the advancements in Rust's formal verification scene too.

Functional Programming (FP): Oh, where do I begin? My intrigue with FP started long before Rust, with languages like Haskell and Erlang. The purity, immutability, and mathematical rigor of functional programming appealed to the part of my brain that thrived on solving intricate problems. It introduced me to concepts like monads, functors, and pure functions. And while Rust isn't purely functional, its emphasis on immutability and its pattern matching capabilities always gave me that familiar FP vibe. I often find myself leaning on functional paradigms even within Rust, making code more declarative and easy to reason about.

Embedded Systems: Now that's a realm where Rust truly shines. I've had a penchant for embedded systems since my earlier hacking days—there's something thrilling about directly manipulating hardware. Rust's zero-cost abstractions and safety guarantees made it an ideal choice for such work. I've worked on several projects, from custom IoT devices to safety-critical systems, where the low-level control of C and C++ was needed, but without their inherent risks. Rust provided that middle ground, where I could work close to the metal without constantly fearing memory errors or data races.

So, in a nutshell, yes—my journey has intertwined with these domains quite intricately. Each experience, each paradigm, has only enriched my understanding and enhanced my ability to tackle complex problems head-on.

Explain your Version control and Continuous Integration experience?

Version control and continuous integration are like my bread and butter. They're essential tools for any serious developer, especially one who's dived as deep into the code matrix as I have.

Version Control: I started with SVN in the earlier days, but then, like many, transitioned to Git. It's not just about committing and pushing code. Understanding Git's internals, from its DAG structure to how it manages content, allows for a deep level of control and granularity. I've often found myself using interactive rebasing, bisecting to hunt down bugs, or even crafting custom hooks to streamline our workflow. One particularly intense operation had me manually editing commit trees and applying patches to salvage a complex branch. In my toolkit, I've also played with more experimental decentralized systems like Pijul and Radicle. But regardless of the tool, the underlying principles remain—keeping a clean, understandable history and ensuring that collaboration remains smooth and conflict-free.

Continuous Integration (CI): Now, this is where the magic happens. Over the years, I've set up and managed various CI/CD pipelines using tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, GitHub Actions, and GitLab CI. I particularly love how Rust's package manager, Cargo, plays so well with CI systems. Running cargo test as a basic check is just the tip of the iceberg. I've incorporated clippy for linting, rustfmt for consistent formatting, and even cargo-audit to keep an eye out for any vulnerable dependencies.

In more sophisticated projects, I've set up matrices of builds to ensure our Rust code runs flawlessly across different platforms and configurations. And of course, there's the performance benchmarking and regression tests, crucial for the optimized, high-performance code we often chase.

But CI isn't just about automated testing. It's about continuously integrating a team's work. It's ensuring that the main branch is always deployable, and every merge is an improvement. With the advent of WebAssembly, I've even set up CI pipelines that compile Rust to WASM and deploy directly to edge locations, ensuring our code runs at near-native speed, everywhere.

And, well, if you ever need a pipeline that fires up a fleet of virtual machines to run a distributed, multi-node Substrate or Polkadot testnet, testing a complex set of interchain transactions... let's just say I've been there and done that.


  1. Explain Rust? Rust is blazingly fast systems programming language that prevents segfaults and guarantees thread safety.

  2. Rust was Designed by whom Originally Rust was designed by Graydon Hoare, Now it managed by Rust project developers.

  3. When the first version of Rust was released The first version of Rust was released in the year 2010.

  4. Rust syntax is similar to which programming Language Rust is syntactically similar to C++.

  5. List some features of Rust? Rust Programming Language comes with following features Sets. zero-cost abstractions move semantics guaranteed memory safety threads without data races trait-based generics pattern matching type inference minimal runtime efficient C bindings

  6. Who uses Rust? Google 360dialog OneSignal Coursera Atlassian Braintree npm, Inc Mozilla Academia.edu Xero

  7. List the Platforms supported by Rust Programming Language Linux, Mac, and Windows, on the x86 and x86-64 CPU architecture, are some major platforms supported by Rust Programming Language.

  8. List steps to install Rust? On Linux and macOS simply open the terminal and run following commands $ curl https://sh.rustup.rs -sSf | sh Above command will download a script, and start the installation process. If everything was good and no error occurred you will see below success message. Rust is installed now. Great! If you are on Windows. Installing Rust is very easy just download and run rustup-init.exe File

  9. Do you remember which command is used to uninstall Rust? $ rustup self uninstall command is used to uninstall Rust programming language.

  10. How to get installed the version of Rust? rustc –version command is used to get installed version of Rust.

  11. How to write and run a Rust Program? Step to create and run a Rust Program create a file name main.rs and add following code in it. fn main() { println!("Hello, Rust!"); } On Linux or macOS to run open terminal run below command

$ rustc main.rs $ ./main

  1. Explain Cargo? Cargo is Rust’s build system and package manager, and Rustaceans use Cargo to manage their Rust projects.Cargo manages three things: building your code, downloading the libraries your code depends on, and building those libraries.

  2. What Is That Cargo.lock? When we run cargo build command it creates a new file called Cargo.lock.Cargo uses the Cargo.lock file to keep track of dependencies in your application.

  3. What cargo new command do? cargo new creates a new project with Cargo. Below is the syntax to create a sample project using Rust Cargo. $ cargo new project_name --bin