You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Any ideas on why I would be getting different generation for the control flow graph of these two functions? These are from two versions of busybox, exported with IDA 8.3 and the f9409a7 commit. I'm not sure where to begin to look for the apparent non-determinism? I haven't reviewed IDA's representation, but I thought BinDiff computed its own control flow.
Here's a second discrepancy from the same diff as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That indeed looks somewhat surprising. However, BinExport still relies on IDA's representation. In AnalyzeFlow(), we simply follow its internal representation and do some fix-ups. So if IDA has spurious basic blocks, BinExport will have them as well.
Any ideas on why I would be getting different generation for the control flow graph of these two functions? These are from two versions of busybox, exported with IDA 8.3 and the f9409a7 commit. I'm not sure where to begin to look for the apparent non-determinism? I haven't reviewed IDA's representation, but I thought BinDiff computed its own control flow.
Here's a second discrepancy from the same diff as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: