Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider a version without jQuery #315

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 3, 2015 · 9 comments
Open

Consider a version without jQuery #315

ghost opened this issue Sep 3, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 3, 2015

Strange as it may sound, nanoScroller is the only plugin left in our project which still has a reference to jQuery. And we are keeping it this way since nanoScroller is the most adequate scrolling plugin I have encountered for the last years.
It would be really cool if you had a version without jQuery dependency as well. What do you think?

@SiteSplat
Copy link

+100

@neuropass
Copy link

+1000

@goors
Copy link

goors commented Sep 4, 2015

+10000

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 4, 2015

I see ten thousand - one, I see ten thousand - two, I see ten thousaaaand...

@Jaeiya
Copy link

Jaeiya commented Sep 7, 2015

+100000

@jamesflorentino
Copy link
Owner

This would be a cool idea. I think it's possible. But I haven't been able
to participate in the recent development of nanoscroller due to my day job.
👍 from me as well hah

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Aedaeum notifications@github.com wrote:

+100000


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#315 (comment)
.

James O. Florentino
Full-stack designer and engineer
http://blog.jamesflorentino.com

@reverofevil
Copy link

(y)

@Nicolab
Copy link

Nicolab commented Sep 24, 2015

👍

@jpetitcolas
Copy link

👍

I just added jQuery on our website to embed this one. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants