Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase icon resolution #44

Open
svelderrainruiz opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Increase icon resolution #44

svelderrainruiz opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@svelderrainruiz
Copy link
Collaborator

Refer to the post from the forums for more information about this https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Increase-Icon-Resolution/idi-p/4300624

We need to identify which activities from that post can be transferred into specific unit testable action items that can be transformed into github issues.

@svelderrainruiz svelderrainruiz self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@Flydroid
Copy link

This is an interesting improvement suggestion to LabVIEW in general. I can think of a few questions which would need to need do be solved (in order)?

  1. Do we know that LabVIEW can handle (and VIs can have) Icons larger than 32x32? Can a new 256x256 icon fit inside the screen space of the old icons? With labVIEWs pixel based UI everthing else also need to be scaled up?
  2. Can it be backwards compatible - does scaling up all 32x32 Icons work?
  3. How would we create large 256x256 Icons? 32x32 is a accaptable amount of pixels to manipulate by hand. With larger Icons it becomes actual graphics design work. Maybe a text to image generator model trained on icons and glyphs?

@crossrulz
Copy link

@Flydroid hit my major issue with this: the rest of LabVIEW has to support a larger icon. Based on my understanding on current implementations, this will not work. Or will the idea be to be able to edit in a 256x256 pixel grid and it then gets scaled down to 32x32? That just seems very inefficient computationally and we, as users, will not get a WYSIWYG.

@svelderrainruiz svelderrainruiz added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 11, 2024
@svelderrainruiz svelderrainruiz added the question Further information is requested label Oct 11, 2024
@svelderrainruiz svelderrainruiz removed their assignment Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants