You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is currently no support for lasers. This seems like a relatively easy addition if we assume only laser cutting is desired. The main parameters are speed and power, though additions like a starting dwell time (for laser turn-on time and punching through thicker materials) can be helpful.
Additionally, I noticed while playing with the tools that you can define a zero depth per cut (appropriate for a laser), but this freezes the program when generating the simulation. I assume that it's trying to create a very large number of passes while somehow avoiding a divide-by-zero error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I fixed the infinite depth bug in this commit (f7ff0f1) as well as adding a laser option for a tool configuration, when enabled retract depth and depth per cut are ignored in final gcode.
I'm currently having issue with my CI and a release is not yet available, though you can compile from source if you want to give it a try.
Concerning dwell, did you try putting it on the same line as the pre cut command ? Will this dwell duration vary ?
Concerning dwell, did you try putting it on the same line as the pre cut command ? Will this dwell duration vary ?
I didn't try playing with dwell. Typically, if a dwell is added for laser turn-on time or punching through material it would be a constant duration (assuming material thickness is constant, which is reasonable).
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is currently no support for lasers. This seems like a relatively easy addition if we assume only laser cutting is desired. The main parameters are speed and power, though additions like a starting dwell time (for laser turn-on time and punching through thicker materials) can be helpful.
Additionally, I noticed while playing with the tools that you can define a zero depth per cut (appropriate for a laser), but this freezes the program when generating the simulation. I assume that it's trying to create a very large number of passes while somehow avoiding a divide-by-zero error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: