Sybil protection for protocol rewards and airdrops using proof of machinehood | Powered by TEEs
- Links
- Introduction
- Background
- Proposed Solution
- Technical Implementation
- Why TEEs and Proof of Machinehood?
- Team
-
This proposal outlines the implementation of a Sybil-resistant system for distributing protocol rewards and airdrops.
-
By utilizing proof of machinehood within a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), we aim to ensure that only legitimate participants receive rewards, thereby enhancing the security and fairness of the process.
-
Sybil Attacks lead to unfair distribution of rewards, reduced trust, and compromised network security.
-
Current solutions are resource-intensive, inconvenient for users, and not entirely foolproof.
-
Using Trusted Execution Environmets(TEEs) to enable secure execution and hardware level attestations for proof of on-chain activity.
-
Proofs can be settled on Automata Network to ensure integrity of the participating machines.
-
Later, we can cross-verify machinehood proofs using multiple TEEs to ensure robustness and filter sybils.
-
Fair Distribution : Using PoM, RewardGuard ensures that only legitimate participants receive rewards, preventing Sybil attackers from gaining an unfair advantage.
-
Scalability & Low cost : TEEs provide a scalable and low cost solution that can handle a large number of participants and verifications efficiently.
-
Verifiable Machine Trust : The verifiable nature of TEEs and the Automata Network enhances the overall trustworthiness of the reward distribution process.
Team AlphaDevs 👇
Harsh Tyagi Yashasvi Chaudhary
Harsh Tyagi Yashasvi Chaudhary
-
Feel free to reach out to the AlphaDevs team with any questions or issues.
-
We appreciate your interest in our project and welcome contributions and feature suggestions.