-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 752
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Github archive #2691
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Github archive #2691
Conversation
…v into feat/github-archive
…v into feat/github-archive
…v into feat/github-archive
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant changes to both the backend and frontend components of the application. Key modifications include the addition of Snowflake configuration settings in the backend, new API endpoints for GitHub organization and repository management, and the introduction of new Vue components for GitHub integration in the frontend. Additionally, several existing GitHub-related components have been removed or refactored. The changes also involve the establishment of a new Snowflake client and associated types, enhancing the application's ability to manage integrations with GitHub and Snowflake. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (80)
backend/src/services/githubIntegrationService.ts (5)
14-14:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the
perPage
parameter to comply with GitHub API limitsThe
perPage
parameter is set to10000
, but the GitHub API's maximum allowedper_page
value is100
. Setting it to a value higher than100
will not fetch more results in a single request. To retrieve all repositories, you need to implement pagination.Here's a suggested modification to handle pagination:
public async getGithubRepositories(org: string) { const client = SnowflakeClient.fromEnv() this.options.log.info(`Getting GitHub repositories for org: ${org}`) const githubClient = new GithubSnowflakeClient(client) let allRepos = [] let page = 1 const perPage = 100 let repos = [] do { repos = await githubClient.getOrgRepositories({ org, perPage, page }) allRepos = allRepos.concat(repos) page++ } while (repos.length === perPage) return allRepos }This modification retrieves repositories in batches of
100
until all repositories are fetched.
25-28:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for the second API request
The second request in
Promise.all
lacks error handling. If it fails, it will cause the promise to reject, potentially crashing the application. To enhance robustness, add error handling similar to the first request.Here's how you can add error handling:
const [orgRepos, repos] = await Promise.all([ request('GET /search/repositories', { q: `owner:${query}`, }).catch((err) => { console.error(`Error getting GitHub repositories for owner: ${query}`, err) return { data: { items: [] } } }), request('GET /search/repositories', { q: query, }).catch((err) => { console.error(`Error searching repositories with query: ${query}`, err) return { data: { items: [] } } }), ])
43-52:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for GitHub API request
The
findOrgs
method does not handle potential errors from the GitHub API. If the request fails, it could lead to unhandled exceptions.Consider adding a try-catch block:
public static async findOrgs(query: string) { let response try { response = await request('GET /search/users', { q: query, }) } catch (err) { console.error(`Error searching GitHub organizations with query: ${query}`, err) return [] } return response.data.items.map((item) => ({ name: item.login, url: item.html_url, logo: item.avatar_url, })) }
54-62:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement error handling for fetching organization repositories
Similar to
findOrgs
, thegetOrgRepos
method lacks error handling. An API failure could result in an unhandled exception.Add error handling as follows:
public static async getOrgRepos(org: string) { let response try { response = await request('GET /orgs/{org}/repos', { org, }) } catch (err) { console.error(`Error fetching repositories for org: ${org}`, err) return [] } return response.data.map((repo) => ({ name: repo.name, url: repo.html_url, })) }
22-22:
⚠️ Potential issueFix usage of
this
in static methodIn the static method
findGithubRepos
,this.options
is referenced, butthis
is not accessible in a static context. This will cause a runtime error.You can fix this by removing the dependency on
this
:- this.options.log.error(`Error getting GitHub repositories for org: ${query}`, err) + console.error(`Error getting GitHub repositories for org: ${query}`, err)Alternatively, consider making
findGithubRepos
an instance method if access to instance properties is required.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 22-22: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
services/libs/snowflake/src/client.ts (2)
76-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the
run
method by removing unnecessary Promise wrappingThe
run
method currently wraps the asynchronous operation in a new Promise, which is unnecessary sincethis.pool.use
returns a Promise. Simplifying the code enhances readability and reduces complexity.Here is the suggested refactor:
- public async run<T>(query: string, binds?: any[]): Promise<T[]> { - return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - this.pool.use(async (connection) => { - try { - const results = await this.executeQuery(connection, query, binds) - resolve(results) - } catch (err) { - reject(err) - } - }) - }) - } + public async run<T>(query: string, binds?: any[]): Promise<T[]> { + return this.pool.use(async (connection) => { + return this.executeQuery<T>(connection, query, binds) + }) + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async run<T>(query: string, binds?: any[]): Promise<T[]> { return this.pool.use(async (connection) => { return this.executeQuery<T>(connection, query, binds) }) }
89-100:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate environment variables in
fromEnv
method to prevent runtime errorsCurrently, missing environment variables could lead to undefined behavior or runtime exceptions. It's essential to validate the presence of required environment variables and provide meaningful error messages.
Here's a suggested approach:
public static fromEnv(extraConfig: any = {}) { + const { + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY, + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, + CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, + } = process.env + + if ( + !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY || + !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT || + !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME || + !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE || + !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE + ) { + throw new Error('Missing required Snowflake environment variables.') + } + return new SnowflakeClient({ - privateKeyString: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY, - account: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, - username: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, - database: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, - warehouse: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, - role: process.env.CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, + privateKeyString: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY, + account: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, + username: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, + database: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, + warehouse: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, + role: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, maxConnections: 1, ...extraConfig, }) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static fromEnv(extraConfig: any = {}) { const { CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY, CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, } = process.env if ( !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY || !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT || !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME || !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE || !CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE ) { throw new Error('Missing required Snowflake environment variables.') } return new SnowflakeClient({ privateKeyString: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY, account: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, username: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, database: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, warehouse: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, role: CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, maxConnections: 1, ...extraConfig, }) }
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/generateStreams.ts (1)
76-81:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle undefined repository to prevent runtime errors
The
repo
variable may beundefined
if a repository with the givenrepoUrl
is not found inmanualSettings.repos
. Accessingrepo.name
without checking can lead to a runtime error. Add a check to handle the case whenrepo
isundefined
.Apply this diff to add the necessary check:
const repo = manualSettings.repos.find((r) => r.url === repoUrl) +if (!repo) { + ctx.abortRunWithError(`Repository not found for URL: ${repoUrl}`) +} await ctx.publishStream<GithubBasicStream>( `${endpoint}:${repo.name}:firstPage`, { repo, page: '', }, )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const repo = manualSettings.repos.find((r) => r.url === repoUrl) if (!repo) { ctx.abortRunWithError(`Repository not found for URL: ${repoUrl}`) } await ctx.publishStream<GithubBasicStream>(`${endpoint}:${repo.name}:firstPage`, { repo, page: '', }) }
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-drawer.vue (4)
120-124:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling in
fetchSubProjects
functionThe
fetchSubProjects
function lacks error handling, which means that ifLfService.findSegment
fails, the error will go unhandled. This could lead to unexpected behavior or application crashes.Apply this diff to handle potential errors:
const fetchSubProjects = () => { LfService.findSegment(route.params.grandparentId) .then((segment) => { subprojects.value = segment.projects.map((p) => p.subprojects).flat(); }) + .catch((error) => { + console.error('Failed to fetch subprojects:', error); + Message.error('Unable to fetch subprojects. Please try again later.'); + }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const fetchSubProjects = () => { LfService.findSegment(route.params.grandparentId) .then((segment) => { subprojects.value = segment.projects.map((p) => p.subprojects).flat(); }) .catch((error) => { console.error('Failed to fetch subprojects:', error); Message.error('Unable to fetch subprojects. Please try again later.'); });
193-212:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined values in
watch
callbackIn the
watch
callback forprops.integration
, accessingvalue.settings.orgs
without null checking could result in a runtime error ifsettings
ororgs
are undefined.Apply this diff to add null checks:
watch(() => props.integration, (value?: Integration<GitHubSettings>) => { if (value) { - const { orgs } = value.settings; + const orgs = value.settings?.orgs || []; organizations.value = orgs .filter((o) => o.fullSync) .map((o) => ({ name: o.name, logo: o.logo, url: o.url, updatedAt: o.updatedAt, })); repositories.value = orgs.reduce((acc: GitHubSettingsRepository[], o) => [...acc, ...o.repos.map((r) => ({ ...r, org: { name: o.name, logo: o.logo, url: o.url, updatedAt: o.updatedAt, }, }))], []); } }, { immediate: true });This prevents potential runtime errors if
settings
ororgs
are undefined.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (value) { const orgs = value.settings?.orgs || []; organizations.value = orgs .filter((o) => o.fullSync) .map((o) => ({ name: o.name, logo: o.logo, url: o.url, updatedAt: o.updatedAt, })); repositories.value = orgs.reduce((acc: GitHubSettingsRepository[], o) => [...acc, ...o.repos.map((r) => ({ ...r, org: { name: o.name, logo: o.logo, url: o.url, updatedAt: o.updatedAt, }, }))], []); }
155-163:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure proper promise chaining in
connect
methodIn the
connect
function, the promise returned byIntegrationService.githubMapRepos
is not being chained correctly. As a result, subsequent operations may execute beforegithubMapRepos
completes, potentially causing race conditions or unexpected behavior.Apply this diff to fix the promise chain:
const connect = () => { let integration: any = null; const settings: GitHubSettings = buildSettings(); (props.integration?.id ? IntegrationService.update(props.integration.id, { settings }) : IntegrationService.create({ settings, platform: 'github', status: 'in-progress' })) .then((res) => { integration = res; - IntegrationService.githubMapRepos(res.id, repoMappings.value, [res.segmentId]); + return IntegrationService.githubMapRepos(res.id, repoMappings.value, [res.segmentId]); }) .then(() => { doFetch([integration.segmentId]); // Rest of the code }) .catch(() => { // Error handling }); };This ensures that
doFetch
is called only aftergithubMapRepos
has successfully completed.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
168-173: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Property name inconsistency in event tracking
The event tracking in
github-settings-drawer.vue
usesintegration: Platform.GITHUB
while all other integration components consistently useplatform
as the property name. This inconsistency should be fixed to maintain uniform analytics data.
- Change
integration: Platform.GITHUB
toplatform: Platform.GITHUB
infrontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-drawer.vue
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure correct event tracking properties
In the
trackEvent
call, verify that all required properties are correctly set and that the event conforms to the analytics schema.Run the following script to check for required properties in event tracking:
This ensures that analytics events are properly recorded.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the 'CONNECT_INTEGRATION' event has all necessary properties. # Expected properties: key, type, properties.integration # Search for 'trackEvent' invocations with 'CONNECT_INTEGRATION' key rg "trackEvent\(\s*{\s*key:\s*FeatureEventKey\.CONNECT_INTEGRATION" # Check if 'integration' property is set to 'github' # The output should show 'integration: Platform.GITHUB'Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler search pattern first to find event tracking usage rg -A 5 "FeatureEventKey.CONNECT_INTEGRATION" # Also search for the event key definition rg "CONNECT_INTEGRATION.*=.*" # Check analytics schema or type definitions fd "analytics|event" --type fLength of output: 10317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the event type definitions and schema cat frontend/src/shared/modules/monitoring/types/event.ts # Also check if there's any standardization of property names across integrations rg -B2 -A2 "properties:\s*{.*platform:" rg -B2 -A2 "properties:\s*{.*integration:"Length of output: 6486
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github/processStream.ts (1)
291-294:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential mismatch in function call in
processPullCommitsStream
.The
processPullCommitsStream
function callsgh.getRepoPushes
, which retrieves repository pushes. However, the function aims to process pull request commits. Consider usinggh.getPullRequestCommits
to fetch commits associated with pull requests.Apply this diff to correct the function call:
-const result = await gh.getRepoPushes({ +const result = await gh.getPullRequestCommits({ repo: data.repo.url, page: data.page, })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-add-repository-modal.vue (2)
101-101:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect
v-for
syntax: Usein
instead ofof
Replace
org of resultOrganizations
withorg in resultOrganizations
in thev-for
directive.Apply this diff:
-<article v-for="org of resultOrganizations" :key="org.url" class="flex justify-between items-center"> +<article v-for="org in resultOrganizations" :key="org.url" class="flex justify-between items-center">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<article v-for="org in resultOrganizations" :key="org.url" class="flex justify-between items-center">
205-214:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for API call in
addOrganizations
functionThe API call to
getOrganizationRepositories
may fail, leading to unhandled errors. Consider adding error handling to manage failed API requests.Apply this diff to add error handling:
const addOrganizations = (org: GitHubOrganization) => { organizations.value.push({ ...org, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() }); GithubApiService.getOrganizationRepositories(org.name) .then((res) => { const newRepositories = (res as GitHubSettingsRepository[]) .filter((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => !repositories.value.some((repo: GitHubSettingsRepository) => repo.url === r.url)) .map((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => ({ ...r, org, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() })); repositories.value = [...repositories.value, ...newRepositories]; }) + .catch(() => { + Message.error('Failed to fetch organization repositories.'); + }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const addOrganizations = (org: GitHubOrganization) => { organizations.value.push({ ...org, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() }); GithubApiService.getOrganizationRepositories(org.name) .then((res) => { const newRepositories = (res as GitHubSettingsRepository[]) .filter((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => !repositories.value.some((repo: GitHubSettingsRepository) => repo.url === r.url)) .map((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => ({ ...r, org, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() })); repositories.value = [...repositories.value, ...newRepositories]; }) .catch(() => { Message.error('Failed to fetch organization repositories.'); }); };
services/libs/snowflake/src/github.ts (3)
28-29:
⚠️ Potential issuePossible Typo in SQL Query Table Alias
In the
getOrgRepositories
method, the FROM clause in your SQL query seems to have a typo or redundant alias:FROM github_events_ingest.cybersyn.github_repos _ingest.cybersyn.github_reposThe alias
_ingest.cybersyn.github_repos
appears incorrect. It might be intended as either:FROM github_events_ingest.cybersyn.github_reposor
FROM github_events_ingest.cybersyn.github_repos AS some_aliasPlease verify and correct the table alias to ensure the query executes properly.
70-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential SQL Injection Risk with Dynamic Query Fragments
In your SQL queries, you're conditionally appending the date filter using template literals:
${since_days_ago ? 'AND CREATED_AT_TIMESTAMP >= DATEADD(day, -?, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP())' : ''}While the parameter value
since_days_ago
is safely passed as a query parameter, constructing SQL queries using template literals can introduce risks if not carefully managed.Consider refactoring to avoid template literals for SQL fragments. One approach is to build the query string and parameters separately:
let dateFilter = ''; const params = [repo]; if (since_days_ago) { dateFilter = 'AND CREATED_AT_TIMESTAMP >= DATEADD(day, -?, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP())'; params.push(since_days_ago); } const result = await this.client.run<IGetResponseType>( `SELECT ... FROM github_events_ingest.cybersyn.github_repos WHERE repo_name = ? AND type = 'EventType' ${dateFilter} ORDER BY CREATED_AT_TIMESTAMP DESC LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`, [...params, perPage, (page - 1) * perPage], );This approach enhances readability and reduces the risk of SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Also applies to: 114-114, 159-159, 204-204, 249-249, 292-292, 336-336, 380-380
354-395: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Correct Pagination Logic in Return Statements
In the
getRepoIssueComments
method, verify that thehasNextPage
calculation accurately reflects the availability of additional pages:hasNextPage: result.length === perPage,If the total number of records is a multiple of
perPage
,hasNextPage
might incorrectly returntrue
even when there are no more records.Consider fetching one extra record to determine if there is a next page:
LIMIT ? + 1And then adjust the
hasNextPage
logic accordingly:const hasNextPage = result.length > perPage; if (hasNextPage) { result.pop(); // Remove the extra record used for checking }This approach ensures
hasNextPage
accurately indicates the presence of additional data.services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github/processData.ts (5)
197-210:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'member.organizations' is defined in 'IMemberData'
When assigning to
member.organizations
, verify that theIMemberData
interface includes theorganizations
property. This prevents potential TypeScript errors due to missing interface definitions.Consider verifying the interface:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if 'organizations' is defined in 'IMemberData' interface # Search for the 'IMemberData' interface and look for 'organizations' property rg -A 10 'interface IMemberData' --glob '**/*.ts' | rg 'organizations'If the property is missing, update the
IMemberData
interface accordingly.
348-348:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks for 'data.payload.forkee.node_id'
In the
parseFork
function, ensure thatdata.payload.forkee
anddata.payload.forkee.node_id
are defined before accessing them. Accessing undefined properties can lead to runtime errors.Apply this diff to add null checks:
const activity: IActivityData = { type: GithubActivityType.FORK, - sourceId: data.payload.forkee.node_id, + sourceId: data.payload.forkee?.node_id || '', sourceParentId: '', timestamp: new Date(data.timestamp).toISOString(), channel: apiData.repo.url, member, score: GITHUB_GRID.fork.score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID.fork.isContribution, }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.sourceId: data.payload.forkee?.node_id || '',
449-450:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined properties in 'sourceId'
In the
parsePullRequestClosed
function,sourceId
concatenates several properties, includingdata.payload.pull_request.node_id
andmemberData.memberFromApi.login
. Ensure these properties are defined to avoid runtime errors.Consider updating the code:
sourceId: `gen-CE_${data.payload.pull_request?.node_id || ''}_${memberData.memberFromApi?.login || 'unknown'}_${new Date( data.timestamp, ).toISOString()}`,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.sourceId: `gen-CE_${data.payload.pull_request?.node_id || ''}_${memberData.memberFromApi?.login || 'unknown'}_${new Date( data.timestamp,
416-416:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'data.payload.pull_request.node_id' is defined
In the
parsePullRequestOpened
function,sourceId
usesdata.payload.pull_request.node_id
. Verify thatdata.payload.pull_request
anddata.payload.pull_request.node_id
are defined to prevent potential runtime errors.Consider adding null checks:
const activity: IActivityData = { type: GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED, - sourceId: data.payload.pull_request.node_id, + sourceId: data.payload.pull_request?.node_id || '', sourceParentId: '', timestamp: new Date(data.timestamp).toISOString(), body: data.payload.pull_request.body, url: data.payload.pull_request._links.html.href, channel: apiData.repo.url, title: data.payload.pull_request.title, attributes: { state: data.payload.pull_request.state.toLowerCase(), // ... }, member, score: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED].score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED].isContribution, }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.sourceId: data.payload.pull_request?.node_id || '',
654-670: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueValidate commit data before processing
In the
parseAuthoredCommit
function, ensure thatdata.payload.commits
is an array and that each commit has the required properties. This prevents runtime errors when processing commits.Apply this diff to add validation:
+if (Array.isArray(data.payload.commits)) { for (const commit of data.payload.commits) { + if (commit && commit.sha && commit.message) { const activity: IActivityData = { channel: apiData.repo.url, url: `${apiData.repo.url}/commit/${commit.sha}`, body: commit.message, type: 'authored-commit', sourceId: commit.sha, sourceParentId: '', timestamp: new Date(data.timestamp).toISOString(), attributes: { - insertions: 'additions' in data.commit ? data.commit.additions : 0, - deletions: 'deletions' in data.commit ? data.commit.deletions : 0, - lines: - 'additions' in data.commit && 'deletions' in data.commit - ? data.commit.additions - data.commit.deletions - : 0, + insertions: 'additions' in data.commit ? data.commit.additions : 0, + deletions: 'deletions' in data.commit ? data.commit.deletions : 0, + lines: ('additions' in data.commit && 'deletions' in data.commit) + ? data.commit.additions - data.commit.deletions + : 0, isMerge: data.commit.parents.totalCount > 1, }, member, score: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].isContribution, } await ctx.publishActivity(activity) + } } +} else { + // Handle the case where commits are not an array + await ctx.abortWithError('Expected commits to be an array') +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (Array.isArray(data.payload.commits)) { for (const commit of data.payload.commits) { if (commit && commit.sha && commit.message) { const activity: IActivityData = { channel: apiData.repo.url, url: `${apiData.repo.url}/commit/${commit.sha}`, body: commit.message, type: 'authored-commit', sourceId: commit.sha, sourceParentId: '', timestamp: new Date(data.timestamp).toISOString(), attributes: { insertions: 'additions' in data.commit ? data.commit.additions : 0, deletions: 'deletions' in data.commit ? data.commit.deletions : 0, lines: ('additions' in data.commit && 'deletions' in data.commit) ? data.commit.additions - data.commit.deletions : 0, isMerge: data.commit.parents.totalCount > 1, }, member, score: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].isContribution, } await ctx.publishActivity(activity) } } } else { // Handle the case where commits are not an array await ctx.abortWithError('Expected commits to be an array') }
services/libs/snowflake/src/types.ts (4)
226-233: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define a Specific Interface for Pull Request Review Payload
The
payload
inIGetRepoPullRequestReviewsResult
is currently typed asRecord<string, unknown>
, which lacks detail. Define a specific interface to represent the payload structure for better type checking.Create an interface for the payload:
export interface IPullRequestReviewPayload { action: string; review: { id: number; body: string; state: string; // additional relevant properties }; pull_request: { number: number; // additional relevant properties }; }Update the
payload
type:export interface IGetRepoPullRequestReviewsResult extends IBasicResponse { sfId: number state: string pullRequestNumber: number timestamp: string - payload: Record<string, unknown> + payload: IPullRequestReviewPayload }
234-726: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Simplifying Deeply Nested Structures
The interfaces for pull request review comments (
IGetRepoPullRequestReviewCommentsResult
) contain deeply nested objects with many properties. This can make maintenance challenging. Assess which fields are essential and simplify the interfaces accordingly.Identify essential fields and adjust the interfaces to include only those fields. For example:
export interface IPullRequestReviewCommentPayload { action: string; comment: { id: number; body: string; user: { login: string; id: number; avatar_url: string; }; created_at: string; updated_at: string; // additional essential properties }; pull_request: { number: number; title: string; // additional essential properties }; } export interface IGetRepoPullRequestReviewCommentsResult extends IBasicResponse { sfId: number action: string pullRequestNumber: number timestamp: string payload: IPullRequestReviewCommentPayload }This refactoring enhances readability and focuses on the most relevant data.
822-1034: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the Issue Comment Interfaces
The
IGetRepoIssueCommentsResult
interface contains extensive nested structures. Consider narrowing down to essential fields to reduce complexity.Modify the interfaces to focus on key properties:
export interface IIssueCommentPayload { action: string; comment: { id: number; body: string; user: { login: string; id: number; avatar_url: string; }; created_at: string; updated_at: string; // additional essential properties }; issue: { number: number; title: string; // additional essential properties }; } export interface IGetRepoIssueCommentsResult extends IBasicResponse { sfId: number action: string issueNumber: number timestamp: string payload: IIssueCommentPayload }This refactoring will make the code easier to work with and maintain.
29-138: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify and Reduce the Payload Size in
IGetRepoForksResult
The
payload.forkee
object contains an extensive list of properties, many of which may not be necessary. Consider selecting only the relevant fields to include in the interface to improve performance and maintainability.Apply this diff to streamline the
forkee
structure:export interface IGetRepoForksResult extends IBasicResponse { sfId: number fork: string forkId: number timestamp: string payload: { forkee: { - // Extensive list of properties + id: number + name: string + full_name: string + owner: { + login: string + id: number + avatar_url: string + } + html_url: string + description: string | null + created_at: string + updated_at: string + pushed_at: string + stargazers_count: number + watchers_count: number + forks_count: number + language: string | null + default_branch: string } } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export interface IGetRepoForksResult extends IBasicResponse { sfId: number fork: string forkId: number timestamp: string payload: { forkee: { id: number name: string full_name: string owner: { login: string id: number avatar_url: string } html_url: string description: string | null created_at: string updated_at: string pushed_at: string stargazers_count: number watchers_count: number forks_count: number language: string | null default_branch: string } } }
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/processStream.ts (4)
93-109:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Token Rotator Initialization
If personal access tokens are not configured,
getTokenRotator
returnsundefined
, which may cause issues in functions that expect a valid token rotator.Consider handling the absence of personal access tokens by throwing an error or providing a fallback mechanism to prevent unexpected behavior.
905-926: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle Specific Errors When Fetching Pull Request Commits
Catching all errors broadly may mask underlying issues. It's better to catch specific errors and handle them appropriately.
Adjust the error handling to catch specific exceptions related to the GitHub API limitations.
try { // Existing code } catch (err) { if (isGraphQLError(err) && isAdditionLimitError(err)) { // Handle the specific error } else { // Re-throw unexpected errors throw err } }Replace
isGraphQLError
andisAdditionLimitError
with appropriate checks for your context.
54-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use Regular Expression Literal Instead of RegExp Constructor
Using a regular expression literal is more concise and avoids unnecessary escaping, improving readability and performance.
Apply this diff to replace the
RegExp
constructor with a regular expression literal:- const hrefRegex = new RegExp('href\\s*=\\s*["\'][^"\']*["\']', 'i') + const hrefRegex = /href\s*=\s*["'][^"']*["']/i📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const hrefRegex = /href\s*=\s*["'][^"']*["']/i
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 54-54: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
86-86:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistency Between Comment and Code for Concurrent Requests Limit
The comment indicates a maximum of 2 concurrent requests, but the code sets the limit to 50. This discrepancy could lead to unintended performance issues.
Please verify the intended maximum number of concurrent requests and update either the code or the comment accordingly.
If the limit should be 2:
- 50, // max 2 concurrent requests + 2, // max 2 concurrent requestsIf the limit should be 50, update the comment:
- 50, // max 2 concurrent requests + 50, // max 50 concurrent requestsCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/processData.ts (4)
95-236: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor
parseMember
Function for Improved Readability and MaintainabilityThe
parseMember
function is quite lengthy and handles multiple responsibilities, including parsing regular members, bots, and deleted users. Consider refactoring it to separate these concerns into smaller, more focused functions. This will enhance readability and make the code easier to maintain and test.Apply this diff to refactor the
parseMember
function:-const parseMember = (memberData: GithubPrepareMemberOutput): IMemberData => { - // existing code -} +const parseMember = (memberData: GithubPrepareMemberOutput): IMemberData => { + const { memberFromApi } = memberData; + + if (memberFromApi.isBot) { + return parseBotMember(memberData); + } + + if (memberFromApi.isDeleted) { + return parseDeletedMember(memberData); + } + + return parseRegularMember(memberData); +}; + +const parseRegularMember = (memberData: GithubPrepareMemberOutput): IMemberData => { + // code to parse regular members +};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
836-865:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential Type Misassignment in
parseAuthoredCommit
The
type
property is assigned the string'authored-commit'
instead of using theGithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT
enum value. This could lead to inconsistencies and harder-to-maintain code.Apply this diff to correct the
type
property assignment:- type: 'authored-commit', + type: GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const data = apiData.data const memberData = apiData.member const member = parseMember(memberData) const sourceParentId = apiData.sourceParentId // this is a pull request id const activity: IActivityData = { channel: apiData.repo.url, url: `${apiData.repo.url}/commit/${data.commit.oid}`, body: data.commit.message, type: GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT, sourceId: data.commit.oid, sourceParentId: `${sourceParentId}`, timestamp: new Date(data.commit.authoredDate).toISOString(), attributes: { insertions: 'additions' in data.commit ? data.commit.additions : 0, deletions: 'deletions' in data.commit ? data.commit.deletions : 0, lines: 'additions' in data.commit && 'deletions' in data.commit ? data.commit.additions - data.commit.deletions : 0, isMerge: data.commit.parents.totalCount > 1, }, member, score: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.AUTHORED_COMMIT].isContribution, } await ctx.publishActivity(activity) }
425-455:
⚠️ Potential issuePossible Missing Attributes in
parsePullRequestOpened
The
parsePullRequestOpened
function constructs anIActivityData
object but may be missing important attributes such asurl
andtitle
when they are undefined. Ensure that these attributes are always provided or handled appropriately to prevent issues when accessing them later.Apply this diff to handle undefined
url
andtitle
:- url: data.url ? data.url : '', - title: data.title, + url: data.url || '', + title: data.title || '',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const parsePullRequestOpened: ProcessDataHandler = async (ctx) => { const apiData = ctx.data as GithubApiData const data = apiData.data as GithubPullRequest const memberData = apiData.member const member = parseMember(memberData) const activity: IActivityData = { type: GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED, sourceId: data.id, sourceParentId: '', timestamp: new Date(data.createdAt).toISOString(), body: data.bodyText, url: data.url || '', channel: apiData.repo.url, title: data.title || '', attributes: { state: data.state.toLowerCase(), additions: data.additions, deletions: data.deletions, changedFiles: data.changedFiles, authorAssociation: data.authorAssociation, labels: data.labels?.nodes.map((l) => l.name), }, member, score: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED].score, isContribution: GITHUB_GRID[GithubActivityType.PULL_REQUEST_OPENED].isContribution, } await ctx.publishActivity(activity) }
1491-1520:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent Spelling of
GithubWehookEvent
The enum
GithubWehookEvent
appears to have a typo in its name (Wehook
instead ofWebhook
). Correcting this will improve code readability and prevent confusion.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
-export enum GithubWehookEvent { +export enum GithubWebhookEvent {Also, update all usages of
GithubWehookEvent
in the codebase accordingly.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubSearchOrgs.ts (1)
5-10:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and input validation.
The current implementation lacks proper error handling and input validation, which could lead to unhandled errors and potential security issues.
Consider applying these improvements:
-export default async (req, res) => { +export default async (req: Request, res: Response) => { + try { + if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { + throw new Error('Invalid or missing query parameter') + } + new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findOrgs(req.query.query) await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) + } catch (error) { + await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default async (req: Request, res: Response) => { try { if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid or missing query parameter') } new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findOrgs(req.query.query) await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) } catch (error) { await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) } }
backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubOrgRepos.ts (3)
5-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript type definitions for request/response parameters.
The function parameters should be properly typed for better type safety and developer experience.
-export default async (req, res) => { +import { Request, Response } from 'express' + +export default async (req: Request, res: Response) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { Request, Response } from 'express' export default async (req: Request, res: Response) => {
6-6:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for permission validation.
The permission check could throw an error, but it's not being handled. This could result in unhandled promise rejections.
- new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) + try { + new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) + } catch (error) { + return req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
8-9:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and error handling for the GitHub API call.
The function needs to:
- Validate the org parameter
- Handle potential GitHub API errors
- Consider rate limiting
- const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.getOrgRepos(req.params.org) - await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) + try { + if (!req.params.org || typeof req.params.org !== 'string') { + throw new Error('Invalid organization parameter') + } + + const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.getOrgRepos(req.params.org) + await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) + } catch (error) { + if (error.status === 403 && error.headers?.['x-ratelimit-remaining'] === '0') { + return req.responseHandler.error( + req, + res, + new Error('GitHub API rate limit exceeded'), + 429 + ) + } + return req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.try { if (!req.params.org || typeof req.params.org !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid organization parameter') } const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.getOrgRepos(req.params.org) await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) } catch (error) { if (error.status === 403 && error.headers?.['x-ratelimit-remaining'] === '0') { return req.responseHandler.error( req, res, new Error('GitHub API rate limit exceeded'), 429 ) } return req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) }
backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubSearchRepos.ts (4)
8-8: 💡 Codebase verification
Error handling needs improvement in GitHub repository search
The verification reveals that error handling is incomplete in the GitHub integration:
- The first API call (org repos) has error handling that logs and returns empty results
- The second API call (general repos) lacks error handling completely
- The controller method doesn't have any try-catch block to handle service-level errors
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify GitHub API integration error handling
Let's verify how the
GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos
method handles GitHub API errors.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error handling in the GitHub integration service ast-grep --pattern 'class GithubIntegrationService { $$$ async findGithubRepos($_) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Look for error handling patterns in the service rg -A 10 "findGithubRepos"Length of output: 1406
8-8:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for the query parameter
The query parameter is passed directly to the service without validation. This could lead to potential security issues or unexpected behavior.
+ if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { + throw new Error400('Query parameter is required and must be a string'); + } + const sanitizedQuery = req.query.query.trim(); - const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(req.query.query) + const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(sanitizedQuery)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { throw new Error400('Query parameter is required and must be a string'); } const sanitizedQuery = req.query.query.trim(); const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(sanitizedQuery)
5-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript type definitions
The function parameters and return type should be properly typed for better maintainability and type safety.
-export default async (req, res) => { +export default async (req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> => {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
5-10:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement proper error handling
The current implementation lacks proper error handling for potential failures in the GitHub API call.
export default async (req, res) => { - new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) + try { + new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) - const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(req.query.query) - await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) + if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { + throw new Error400('Query parameter is required and must be a string'); + } + const sanitizedQuery = req.query.query.trim(); + + const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(sanitizedQuery) + await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) + } catch (error) { + if (error instanceof Error400) { + await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) + } else { + await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, new Error500('Failed to search GitHub repositories')) + } + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default async (req, res) => { try { new PermissionChecker(req).validateHas(Permissions.values.integrationEdit) if (!req.query.query || typeof req.query.query !== 'string') { throw new Error400('Query parameter is required and must be a string'); } const sanitizedQuery = req.query.query.trim(); const payload = await GithubIntegrationService.findGithubRepos(sanitizedQuery) await req.responseHandler.success(req, res, payload) } catch (error) { if (error instanceof Error400) { await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, error) } else { await req.responseHandler.error(req, res, new Error500('Failed to search GitHub repositories')) } } }
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/types/GithubSettings.ts (1)
1-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential fields and type constraints to base interfaces
The base interfaces could be enhanced for better type safety and data integrity:
Consider applying these improvements:
+// ISO 8601 timestamp type for consistency +type ISOTimestamp = string; export interface GitHubOrganization { + id: string; // GitHub organization ID logo: string; name: string; - url: string; + url: URL; // Using URL type for validation - updatedAt?: string; + updatedAt?: ISOTimestamp; } export interface GitHubRepository { + id: string; // GitHub repository ID name: string; - url: string; + url: URL; // Using URL type for validation org?: GitHubOrganization; }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/config.ts (1)
12-12: 💡 Codebase verification
Functionality preserved but with reduced visibility
The new dropdown implementation has preserved the core functionality of opening the GitHub settings drawer, but it has made the "Map repositories" action less prominent by moving it behind a dropdown menu. This could impact user experience during the repository mapping phase.
- The original
github-action.vue
showed a dedicated "Map repositories" button when status was "mapping"- The new
github-dropdown.vue
only shows a generic "Settings" option in the dropdown- The settings drawer integration is preserved but with reduced context-awareness
Consider:
- Adding a status-aware label in the dropdown item when integration status is "mapping"
- Or keeping a separate prominent action button for the mapping state while using the dropdown for other actions
🔗 Analysis chain
Architectural change: Consolidating UI components
The replacement of separate status and action components with a unified dropdown component represents a good architectural improvement:
- Reduces component fragmentation
- Simplifies the UI/UX by consolidating GitHub-related actions
- Follows modern UI patterns for integration management
However, please ensure that all functionality from the previous components has been preserved in the new dropdown implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the new dropdown component to verify feature parity # Check the implementation of the new dropdown component echo "Analyzing GithubDropdown implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'template { $$$ }' frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/github-dropdown.vue # Look for potential missing features by checking the old components in git history git log -p --full-history -- '**/github-status*' '**/github-action*'Length of output: 4954
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of the new GithubDropdown component # First, verify if the file exists fd -t f "github-dropdown.vue" frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/ # If it exists, check its contents rg -U "template|script" -A 10 frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/github-dropdown.vue # Also check for any settings drawer references to ensure the mapping functionality is preserved rg -U "github-settings-drawer" frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/Length of output: 1796
services/libs/snowflake/src/test.ts (3)
19-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test structure and error handling
The current implementation uses
setImmediate
and lacks proper error handling for the API call. Consider restructuring this as a proper test suite.Consider refactoring to use a testing framework like Jest:
-setImmediate(async () => { - const res = await gh.getOrgRepositories({ org: 'CrowdDotDev' }) - console.log(res) -}) +describe('GithubSnowflakeClient', () => { + it('should fetch organization repositories', async () => { + try { + const res = await gh.getOrgRepositories({ org: 'CrowdDotDev' }); + expect(res).toBeDefined(); + // Add more specific assertions based on expected response structure + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch repositories:', error); + throw error; + } + }); +});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
8-15:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Hardcoded credentials in source code
The Snowflake client configuration contains hardcoded credentials and configuration values. This is a security risk and makes the code less maintainable.
Consider using environment variables for sensitive configuration:
const sf = new SnowflakeClient({ - account: 'xmb01974', - username: 'DEV_IKOTUA', - database: 'GITHUB_EVENTS_INGEST', - warehouse: 'DBT_DEV', - role: 'DBT_TRANSFORM_DEV', + account: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, + username: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, + database: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, + warehouse: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, + role: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, privateKeyString: privateKeyString, })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const sf = new SnowflakeClient({ account: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT, username: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME, database: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE, warehouse: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE, role: process.env.SNOWFLAKE_ROLE, privateKeyString: privateKeyString, })
1-6:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling for file operations
The file reading operation lacks error handling and could fail if the private key file doesn't exist or is inaccessible.
Apply this diff to add proper error handling:
import fs from 'fs' import { SnowflakeClient } from './client' import { GithubSnowflakeClient } from './github' -const privateKeyString = fs.readFileSync(process.env.HOME + '/.sf/rsa_key.p8', 'utf8') +let privateKeyString: string; +try { + privateKeyString = fs.readFileSync(process.env.HOME + '/.sf/rsa_key.p8', 'utf8'); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to read Snowflake private key:', error); + process.exit(1); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import fs from 'fs' import { SnowflakeClient } from './client' import { GithubSnowflakeClient } from './github' let privateKeyString: string; try { privateKeyString = fs.readFileSync(process.env.HOME + '/.sf/rsa_key.p8', 'utf8'); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to read Snowflake private key:', error); process.exit(1); }
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/index.ts (1)
19-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety in postProcess function
The function uses
any
type and lacks proper type definitions, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits.Consider implementing proper types:
- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any - postProcess: (settings: any) => { + postProcess: (settings: IntegrationSettings) => {Also, the function simply returns the input without any processing. If no post-processing is needed, consider documenting why this pass-through exists.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/github-dropdown.vue (1)
19-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper typing for the integration prop
Using
any
type reduces type safety. Consider creating and using a proper interface for the integration prop.+interface GitHubIntegration { + // Add relevant properties based on the integration object structure + id: string; + type: string; + // ... other properties +} const props = defineProps<{ - integration: any, + integration: GitHubIntegration, }>();Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/ui-kit/drawer/Drawer.stories.ts (1)
8-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix props configuration issues.
Several improvements needed in the props configuration:
- The
modelValue
prop's defaultValue should be a boolean, not a string- The
width
prop should validate CSS units- The
closeFunction
prop needs clearer documentationApply these changes:
modelValue: { description: 'Is drawer open', - defaultValue: 'false', + defaultValue: false, control: 'boolean', }, width: { - description: 'Specifies drawer width', + description: 'Specifies drawer width (e.g., "37.5rem", "500px")', defaultValue: '37.5rem', control: 'text', }, closeFunction: { - description: 'Function that prevents drawer from closing', + description: 'Function that returns boolean to prevent drawer from closing when true', control: { type: null, }, },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Props modelValue: { description: 'Is drawer open', defaultValue: false, control: 'boolean', }, width: { description: 'Specifies drawer width (e.g., "37.5rem", "500px")', defaultValue: '37.5rem', control: 'text', }, closeFunction: { description: 'Function that returns boolean to prevent drawer from closing when true', control: { type: null, }, },
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-empty.vue (1)
1-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and maintainability of the template.
Several improvements can be made to the template:
- Use semantic HTML elements for better accessibility
- Add ARIA attributes
- Externalize text content for internationalization
- Standardize icon component usage
Consider applying these changes:
<template> <div class="flex justify-center"> - <div class="pt-16 flex flex-col items-center w-full max-w-100"> - <lf-icon-old name="git-repository-line" :size="64" class="text-gray-300 mb-6" /> - <h6 class="text-center pb-3"> + <section class="pt-16 flex flex-col items-center w-full max-w-100" role="region" aria-labelledby="github-settings-title"> + <lf-icon name="git-repository-line" :size="64" class="text-gray-300 mb-6" aria-hidden="true" /> + <h2 id="github-settings-title" class="text-center pb-3 text-h6"> Sync and map GitHub repositories - </h6> + </h2> <p class="text-center text-small text-gray-500 pb-6"> Choose which repositories you want to track, and map them with the corresponding project. </p> - <lf-button type="primary-ghost" @click="emit('add')"> + <lf-button + type="primary-ghost" + @click="emit('add')" + aria-label="Add GitHub repositories"> <lf-icon name="arrows-rotate" type="regular" /> Add repositories </lf-button> - </div> + </section> </div> </template>Also, consider adding these changes in a separate file:
// i18n/github-settings.ts export default { title: 'Sync and map GitHub repositories', description: 'Choose which repositories you want to track, and map them with the corresponding project.', addButton: 'Add repositories' }frontend/src/ui-kit/search/Search.vue (1)
27-27:
⚠️ Potential issueFix type mismatch between props and ref
The
modelValue
prop acceptsstring | number
, butvalueProxy
is typed asstring
. This could cause type errors when a number value is provided.Apply this fix:
-const valueProxy = ref<string>(props.modelValue); +const valueProxy = ref<string | number>(props.modelValue);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const valueProxy = ref<string | number>(props.modelValue);
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/services/github.api.service.ts (3)
21-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueAddress code duplication and secure URL parameters
Both methods share similar patterns and would benefit from shared error handling. Additionally, the organization name in the URL path needs to be properly encoded.
Consider extracting common functionality and securing the URL:
// Add this helper function async function makeGithubRequest<T>( path: string, params?: Record<string, string> ): Promise<T> { const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId(); if (!tenantId) { throw new Error('Tenant ID is required'); } try { const response = await authAxios.get( `/tenant/${tenantId}/integration/github/${path}`, params ? { params } : undefined ); return response.data; } catch (error) { throw new Error(`GitHub API request failed: ${error.message}`); } } // Then refactor the methods to use it: static async searchOrganizations(query: string): Promise<GitHubOrganization[]> { if (!query?.trim()) { throw new Error('Search query cannot be empty'); } return makeGithubRequest('search/orgs', { query: query.trim() }); } static async getOrganizationRepositories(name: string): Promise<GitHubRepository[]> { if (!name?.trim()) { throw new Error('Organization name cannot be empty'); } return makeGithubRequest(`orgs/${encodeURIComponent(name.trim())}/repos`); }
1-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring the class to standalone functions
The class currently only contains static methods, which suggests it's being used as a namespace. In TypeScript, it's more idiomatic to use either a namespace or standalone functions.
Consider refactoring like this:
-export class GithubApiService { - static async searchRepositories +export async function searchGithubRepositoriesCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
6-19:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and error handling
The method should validate the query parameter and implement proper error handling for failed requests.
Consider implementing these improvements:
- static async searchRepositories(query: string): Promise<GitHubRepository[]> { + static async searchRepositories(query: string): Promise<GitHubRepository[]> { + if (!query?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Search query cannot be empty'); + } + const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId(); + if (!tenantId) { + throw new Error('Tenant ID is required'); + } - const response = await authAxios.get( - `/tenant/${tenantId}/integration/github/search/repos`, - { - params: { - query, - }, - }, - ); + try { + const response = await authAxios.get( + `/tenant/${tenantId}/integration/github/search/repos`, + { + params: { + query: query.trim(), + }, + }, + ); - return response.data; + return response.data; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to search repositories: ${error.message}`); + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.static async searchRepositories(query: string): Promise<GitHubRepository[]> { if (!query?.trim()) { throw new Error('Search query cannot be empty'); } const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId(); if (!tenantId) { throw new Error('Tenant ID is required'); } try { const response = await authAxios.get( `/tenant/${tenantId}/integration/github/search/repos`, { params: { query: query.trim(), }, }, ); return response.data; } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to search repositories: ${error.message}`); } }
frontend/src/ui-kit/drawer/Drawer.vue (2)
40-45:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle async closeFunction and add error handling
The clickOutsideClose function needs to handle async closeFunction and potential errors:
-const clickOutsideClose = () => { - const canClose = props.closeFunction(); +const clickOutsideClose = async () => { + try { + const canClose = await Promise.resolve(props.closeFunction()); if (canClose) { close(); } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error in closeFunction:', error); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const clickOutsideClose = async () => { try { const canClose = await Promise.resolve(props.closeFunction()); if (canClose) { close(); } } catch (error) { console.error('Error in closeFunction:', error); } };
47-59:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove event handling and prevent memory leaks
Several improvements needed for the event handling:
- Use event.key instead of deprecated event.which
- Add proper TypeScript types
- Clean up event listener on component unmount
-const onEscapeKeyUp = (event: any) => { - if (event.which === 27) { +const onEscapeKeyUp = (event: KeyboardEvent) => { + if (event.key === 'Escape') { clickOutsideClose(); } }; +onBeforeUnmount(() => { + window.removeEventListener('keyup', onEscapeKeyUp); +});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const onEscapeKeyUp = (event: KeyboardEvent) => { if (event.key === 'Escape') { clickOutsideClose(); } }; watch(() => isDrawerOpened.value, (show: boolean) => { if (!show) { window.removeEventListener('keyup', onEscapeKeyUp); } else { window.addEventListener('keyup', onEscapeKeyUp); } }, { immediate: true }); onBeforeUnmount(() => { window.removeEventListener('keyup', onEscapeKeyUp); });
services/apps/integration_stream_worker/config/custom-environment-variables.json (1)
44-51: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect namespace for Snowflake configuration - Action Required
The review comment is correct. The configuration section named "github" in
services/apps/integration_stream_worker/config/custom-environment-variables.json
contains Snowflake credentials but is incorrectly namespaced. This is evidenced by:
- The presence of Snowflake client initialization in the codebase that uses these exact environment variables (
CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_*
)- The proper namespacing of these variables under "snowflake" in another config file (
backend/config/custom-environment-variables.json
)- The default configuration shows no GitHub-related settings in this section
The configuration should be renamed from "github" to "snowflake" to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase and accurately reflect its purpose.
🔗 Analysis chain
Incorrect namespace for Snowflake configuration.
The configuration section is named "github" but contains Snowflake-related settings. This creates confusion and violates the principle of least surprise.
Consider these improvements:
- Rename the section to match its purpose:
- "github": { + "snowflake": { "privateKey": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY", "account": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT", "username": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_USERNAME", "database": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_DATABASE", "warehouse": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_WAREHOUSE", "role": "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_ROLE" },
- Verify the impact of this configuration change:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any hardcoded references to config.github that should be updated to config.snowflake # Search for config.github references echo "Searching for potential hardcoded config.github references that need updating:" rg -l "config\.github\." --type ts --type js # Search for environment variable usage echo "Checking environment variable usage:" rg "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_" --type dockerfile --type shLength of output: 381
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search approach # 1. Search for any references to github configuration in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'github' configuration references:" rg "github['\"]?\s*:\s*{" --type ts --type js -C 2 # 2. Search for Snowflake environment variables in all files echo -e "\nSearching for Snowflake environment variables:" rg "CROWD_SNOWFLAKE_" -C 2 # 3. Look for config files that might use this configuration echo -e "\nSearching for config files:" fd -e json -e js -e ts "config" --type fLength of output: 13410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check how this configuration is being used in the codebase # 1. Search for references to config.github in the integration_stream_worker echo "Searching for config.github usage in integration_stream_worker:" rg "config\.github" services/apps/integration_stream_worker -C 3 # 2. Check the default configuration to understand the intended structure echo -e "\nChecking default configuration:" cat services/apps/integration_stream_worker/config/default.json # 3. Let's also check if there are any Snowflake client initializations echo -e "\nChecking Snowflake client usage:" rg "new SnowflakeClient|SnowflakeClient\.fromEnv" -C 3Length of output: 3213
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/grid.ts (1)
70-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider commit scoring weight
The current scoring gives commits (2 points) significantly less weight than PR comments (6 points) or issue comments (6 points). Since commits represent actual code contributions, consider increasing their score to better reflect their value to the project.
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-repo-item.vue (3)
65-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace 'any' type with a proper interface
Using
any
type reduces type safety and IDE support.Consider creating a proper interface for subprojects:
interface Subproject { id: string; name: string; // Add other relevant properties }Then update the prop type:
- subprojects: any[]; + subprojects: Subproject[];
96-100:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd guard clause for empty subprojects array
The watcher assumes that
subprojects
array has at least one item, which could cause runtime errors if the array is empty.watch(() => model.value, (value) => { if (!value) { + if (!props.subprojects.length) return; model.value = props.subprojects[0].id; } }, { immediate: true });
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.watch(() => model.value, (value) => { if (!value) { if (!props.subprojects.length) return; model.value = props.subprojects[0].id; } }, { immediate: true });
23-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add ARIA label for better accessibility
The select component lacks an aria-label which could impact accessibility for screen readers.
<el-select v-model="model" placeholder="Select sub-project" + aria-label="Select sub-project for repository" class="w-full" placement="bottom-end" filterable @blur="$v.model.$touch" @change="$v.model.$touch" >
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<el-select v-model="model" placeholder="Select sub-project" aria-label="Select sub-project for repository" class="w-full" placement="bottom-end" filterable @blur="$v.model.$touch" @change="$v.model.$touch" > <el-option v-for="subproject of props.subprojects" :key="subproject.id" :value="subproject.id" :label="subproject.name" /> </el-select>
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-mapping.vue (2)
84-84: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
any[]
with a proper type definitionUsing
any[]
reduces type safety and makes the code more prone to runtime errors.Consider creating a proper interface for subprojects:
interface Subproject { id: string; name: string; // Add other relevant properties }Then update the prop type:
-subprojects: any[]; +subprojects: Subproject[];
113-125: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and simplify organization processing
The current implementation has several issues:
- Uses non-null assertions without proper checks
- Uses
any
type- Complex reduce logic could be simplified
Consider this safer implementation:
-const allOrganizations = computed<any[]>(() => { +interface ProcessedOrganization extends GitHubOrganization { + repositories: GitHubSettingsRepository[]; +} + +const allOrganizations = computed<ProcessedOrganization[]>(() => { const owners = new Set(); return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: any[], r) => { - if (!owners.has(r.org!.name)) { - owners.add(r.org!.name); + const org = r.org; + if (!org) return acc; + + if (!owners.has(org.name)) { + owners.add(org.name); acc.push({ - ...(r.org!), - repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org!.url === r.org!.url), + ...org, + repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org?.url === org.url), }); } return acc; - }, []); + }, [] as ProcessedOrganization[]); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface ProcessedOrganization extends GitHubOrganization { repositories: GitHubSettingsRepository[]; } const allOrganizations = computed<ProcessedOrganization[]>(() => { const owners = new Set(); return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: any[], r) => { const org = r.org; if (!org) return acc; if (!owners.has(org.name)) { owners.add(org.name); acc.push({ ...org, repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org?.url === org.url), }); } return acc; }, [] as ProcessedOrganization[]); });
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-org-item.vue (4)
55-58:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd confirmation dialog for destructive action.
The remove organization action is destructive and affects all repositories. It should have a confirmation dialog to prevent accidental clicks.
Consider implementing a confirmation dialog before executing the remove action. I can help implement this if needed.
25-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add aria-label to icon-only button for accessibility.
The icon-only button needs an accessible label for screen readers.
- <lf-button type="secondary-ghost" icon-only> + <lf-button type="secondary-ghost" icon-only aria-label="Organization settings"> <lf-icon name="ellipsis" /> </lf-button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<lf-button type="secondary-ghost" icon-only aria-label="Organization settings"> <lf-icon name="ellipsis" /> </lf-button>
119-122:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined org property safely.
The
remove
function uses a non-null assertion (org!.url
) which could cause runtime errors iforg
is undefined.const remove = () => { unsync(); - repos.value = repos.value.filter((repo) => repo.org!.url !== props.organization.url); + repos.value = repos.value.filter((repo) => repo.org?.url === props.organization.url); };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
104-113:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and loading state for API call.
The
sync
function makes an API call but doesn't handle errors or show loading state to users.Consider implementing error handling and loading state:
+const isLoading = ref(false); +const error = ref<Error | null>(null); const sync = async () => { + isLoading.value = true; + error.value = null; orgs.value.push({ ...props.organization, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() }); - GithubApiService.getOrganizationRepositories(props.organization.name) - .then((res) => { + try { + const res = await GithubApiService.getOrganizationRepositories(props.organization.name); const newRepositories = (res as GitHubSettingsRepository[]) .filter((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => !repos.value.some((repo: GitHubSettingsRepository) => repo.url === r.url)) .map((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => ({ ...r, org: props.organization, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() })); repos.value = [...repos.value, ...newRepositories]; - }); + } catch (e) { + error.value = e as Error; + // Rollback the organization addition on error + orgs.value = orgs.value.filter(org => org.url !== props.organization.url); + } finally { + isLoading.value = false; + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const isLoading = ref(false); const error = ref<Error | null>(null); const sync = async () => { isLoading.value = true; error.value = null; orgs.value.push({ ...props.organization, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() }); try { const res = await GithubApiService.getOrganizationRepositories(props.organization.name); const newRepositories = (res as GitHubSettingsRepository[]) .filter((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => !repos.value.some((repo: GitHubSettingsRepository) => repo.url === r.url)) .map((r: GitHubSettingsRepository) => ({ ...r, org: props.organization, updatedAt: dayjs().toISOString() })); repos.value = [...repos.value, ...newRepositories]; } catch (e) { error.value = e as Error; // Rollback the organization addition on error orgs.value = orgs.value.filter(org => org.url !== props.organization.url); } finally { isLoading.value = false; } };
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github-old/types.ts (9)
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing the ESLint disable comment.
The blanket disable of
@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
reduces type safety. Consider explicitly typing theany
occurrences throughout the file.
85-85:
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in enum name
GithubWehookEvent
.The enum name contains a typo: "Wehook" should be "Webhook".
-export enum GithubWehookEvent { +export enum GithubWebhookEvent {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export enum GithubWebhookEvent {
234-240: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize property naming in
GithubBotMember
.The interface mixes camelCase (
avatarUrl
) and snake_case (avatar_url
) naming conventions.export interface GithubBotMember { login: string; avatarUrl: string; - avatar_url?: string; // Remove duplicate snake_case property id: string; url: string; }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export interface GithubBotMember { login: string avatarUrl: string id: string url: string }
66-71: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
any
types with proper interfaces in webhook payload.The webhook payload uses
any
type for both event and data properties.+interface GithubWebhookEvent { + type: string; + payload: Record<string, unknown>; +} + export interface GithubWebhookPayload { signature: string; - event: any; - data: any; + event: GithubWebhookEvent; + data: Record<string, unknown>; date?: string; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface GithubWebhookEvent { type: string; payload: Record<string, unknown>; } export interface GithubWebhookPayload { signature: string; event: GithubWebhookEvent; data: Record<string, unknown>; date?: string; }
161-171: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use boolean type for
isCommitDataEnabled
.The
isCommitDataEnabled
property is using string type but should be boolean based on its name.export interface GithubPlatformSettings { appId: string; clientId: string; clientSecret: string; privateKey: string; webhookSecret: string; - isCommitDataEnabled: string; + isCommitDataEnabled: boolean; globalLimit?: number; callbackUrl: string; personalAccessTokens: string; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export interface GithubPlatformSettings { appId: string clientId: string clientSecret: string privateKey: string webhookSecret: string isCommitDataEnabled: boolean globalLimit?: number callbackUrl: string personalAccessTokens: string }
48-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
any
types with proper interfaces in timeline items.Both timeline interfaces use
any
type which reduces type safety.+interface GithubActor { + id: string; + login: string; + avatarUrl: string; + url: string; +} + export interface GithubPullRequestTimelineItem { __typename: string; id: string; - actor: any; + actor: GithubActor; createdAt: string; - assignee?: any; + assignee?: GithubActor; // ... } export interface GithubIssueTimelineItem { __typename: string; id: string; - actor?: any; + actor?: GithubActor; // ... }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface GithubActor { id: string; login: string; avatarUrl: string; url: string; } export interface GithubPullRequestTimelineItem { __typename: string id: string actor: GithubActor createdAt: string assignee?: GithubActor submittedAt?: string body?: string state?: string } export interface GithubIssueTimelineItem { __typename: string id: string actor?: GithubActor createdAt: string }
33-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
any[]
with a properly typed label interface.The
labels.nodes
property usesany[]
which reduces type safety.+interface GithubLabel { + id: string; + name: string; + color: string; + description?: string; +} + export interface GithubPullRequest { // ... labels?: { - nodes?: any[] + nodes?: GithubLabel[] } // ... }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
124-146: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and consider consolidating similar interfaces.
Both
GithubApiData
andGithubWebhookData
interfaces:
- Use
any
types extensively- Share similar structure
+interface BaseGithubData { + data: Record<string, unknown>[] | Record<string, unknown>; + relatedData?: Record<string, unknown> | Record<string, unknown>[]; + member?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; + orgMember?: GithubPrepareOrgMemberOutput; + objectMember?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; + sourceParentId?: string; +} + -export interface GithubApiData { +export interface GithubApiData extends BaseGithubData { type: GithubActivityType; subType?: string; - data: any[] | any; - relatedData?: any | any[]; - member?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; - orgMember?: GithubPrepareOrgMemberOutput; - objectMember?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; - sourceParentId?: string; repo: Repo; } -export interface GithubWebhookData { +export interface GithubWebhookData extends BaseGithubData { webhookType: GithubWebhookEvent; subType?: string; - data: any[] | any; - relatedData?: any | any[]; - member?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; - orgMember?: GithubPrepareOrgMemberOutput; - objectMember?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; - sourceParentId?: string; date?: string; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface BaseGithubData { data: Record<string, unknown>[] | Record<string, unknown>; relatedData?: Record<string, unknown> | Record<string, unknown>[]; member?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; orgMember?: GithubPrepareOrgMemberOutput; objectMember?: GithubPrepareMemberOutput; sourceParentId?: string; } export interface GithubApiData extends BaseGithubData { type: GithubActivityType; subType?: string; repo: Repo; } export interface GithubWebhookData extends BaseGithubData { webhookType: GithubWebhookEvent; subType?: string; date?: string; }
228-233: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
any
types inGithubPrepareMemberOutput
.The interface uses
any
type for multiple fields which reduces type safety.+interface GithubOrg { + id: string; + login: string; + url: string; +} + +interface GithubMemberApi { + id: string; + login: string; + avatarUrl: string; + url: string; + email?: string; +} + export interface GithubPrepareMemberOutput { email: string; - orgs: any; - memberFromApi: any; + orgs: GithubOrg[]; + memberFromApi: GithubMemberApi; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface GithubOrg { id: string; login: string; url: string; } interface GithubMemberApi { id: string; login: string; avatarUrl: string; url: string; email?: string; } export interface GithubPrepareMemberOutput { email: string; orgs: GithubOrg[]; memberFromApi: GithubMemberApi; }
backend/src/api/integration/index.ts (2)
47-58:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd authentication middleware to protect GitHub endpoints
The new GitHub endpoints are missing the
authMiddleware
that's present on other sensitive endpoints in this file. This could expose GitHub organization and repository data to unauthorized users.Add the authentication middleware to each endpoint:
app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/search/orgs`, + authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubSearchOrgs').default), ) app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/search/repos`, + authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubSearchRepos').default), ) app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/orgs/:org/repos`, + authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubOrgRepos').default), )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/search/orgs`, authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubSearchOrgs').default), ) app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/search/repos`, authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubSearchRepos').default), ) app.get( `/tenant/:tenantId/integration/github/orgs/:org/repos`, authMiddleware, safeWrap(require('./helpers/githubOrgRepos').default), )
47-58: 💡 Codebase verification
GitHub API integration needs improvements for error handling and pagination
The implementation has several issues that need to be addressed:
- Error handling is inconsistent - only implemented in
findGithubRepos
for org repos query but missing in other methods- No rate limit handling across all GitHub API calls
- Pagination is only properly handled in
getGithubRepositories
method (usingperPage: 10000
), but missing in other methods that use the GitHub API directly- No retry mechanism for failed requests
Key locations requiring updates:
findOrgs
: Add error handling and paginationgetOrgRepos
: Add error handling and paginationfindGithubRepos
: Add pagination for both queries- All methods: Add rate limit handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the implementation of GitHub helper functions
Let's verify that the helper functions properly handle GitHub API rate limits, pagination, and error cases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check implementation of GitHub helper functions # Check for rate limiting and pagination handling echo "Checking for rate limit handling..." rg -A 5 "rate.*limit" "./backend/src/api/integration/helpers/github*.ts" echo "Checking for pagination handling..." rg -A 5 "page|per_page" "./backend/src/api/integration/helpers/github*.ts" # Check error handling echo "Checking error handling..." rg -A 5 "catch|throw|error" "./backend/src/api/integration/helpers/github*.ts"Length of output: 724
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find the correct paths for the GitHub helper files echo "Finding GitHub helper files..." fd "githubSearchOrgs|githubSearchRepos|githubOrgRepos" backend/src/api/integration/helpers/ # Once we find the files, let's check their implementation echo -e "\nChecking rate limit handling..." rg -A 5 "rate.*limit" backend/src/api/integration/helpers/ echo -e "\nChecking pagination handling..." rg -A 5 "page|per_page" backend/src/api/integration/helpers/ echo -e "\nChecking error handling..." rg -A 5 "catch|throw|error" backend/src/api/integration/helpers/Length of output: 8701
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the content of the GitHub helper files directly echo "Content of githubSearchOrgs.ts:" cat backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubSearchOrgs.ts echo -e "\nContent of githubSearchRepos.ts:" cat backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubSearchRepos.ts echo -e "\nContent of githubOrgRepos.ts:" cat backend/src/api/integration/helpers/githubOrgRepos.tsLength of output: 1736
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the GithubIntegrationService implementation echo "Searching for GithubIntegrationService implementation..." fd "githubIntegrationService" backend/src/services/ echo -e "\nChecking content of GithubIntegrationService..." cat backend/src/services/githubIntegrationService.tsLength of output: 2227
…v into feat/github-archive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-mapping.vue (3)
36-45
: Enhance table accessibility.The table header lacks proper ARIA attributes for better screen reader support.
<thead> - <tr> + <tr role="row"> - <th class="w-5/12"> + <th class="w-5/12" role="columnheader" scope="col"> Repository </th> - <th class="w-7/12"> + <th class="w-7/12" role="columnheader" scope="col"> Mapped with </th> </tr> </thead>
65-65
: Consider optimizing bulk mapping update.Using the spread operator for bulk updates might cause unnecessary re-renders. Consider using Object.assign or a more targeted update approach.
-@apply="repoMappings = { ...repoMappings, ...$event }" +@apply="Object.assign(repoMappings, $event)"
117-118
: Optimize filteredRepos computed property.The current implementation creates new strings on each computation. Consider moving toLowerCase() calls outside the filter.
-const filteredRepos = computed(() => repos.value.filter((r) => r.name.toLowerCase().includes(search.value.toLowerCase()) - || (r.org?.name || '').toLowerCase().includes(search.value.toLowerCase()))); +const filteredRepos = computed(() => { + const searchTerm = search.value.toLowerCase(); + return repos.value.filter((r) => { + const repoName = r.name.toLowerCase(); + const orgName = (r.org?.name || '').toLowerCase(); + return repoName.includes(searchTerm) || orgName.includes(searchTerm); + }); +});frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-repo-item.vue (4)
65-65
: Specify the type for 'subprojects' prop instead of using 'any[]'Using
any[]
for thesubprojects
prop undermines type safety. Defining a specific interface improves code readability and maintainability.Define an interface for
Subproject
and update the prop type:+ interface Subproject { + id: string; + name: string; + } const props = defineProps<{ repositories: GitHubRepository[]; repository: GitHubRepository; - subprojects: any[]; + subprojects: Subproject[]; modelValue: string; orgSyncing: boolean; }>();
70-71
: Refine 'defineEmits' for better TypeScript compatibilityThe current
defineEmits
usage with an object type is less optimal. Using the function syntax enhances type inference and code clarity.Update
defineEmits
as follows:const emit = defineEmits<{ - (e: 'update:repositories', value: GitHubRepository[]): void, - (e: 'update:modelValue', value: string): void + 'update:repositories': (value: GitHubRepository[]) => void; + 'update:modelValue': (value: string) => void; }>();
104-108
: Consolidate multiple<script>
blocks into oneHaving two
<script>
blocks can cause confusion and is not recommended. Merge them into a single block for better organization.Remove the second
<script>
block and set the component name usingdefineOptions
:- </script> - <script lang="ts"> - export default { - name: 'LfGithubSettingsRepoItem', - }; + defineOptions({ + name: 'LfGithubSettingsRepoItem', + }); </script>
24-38
: Enhance accessibility of the select componentAdding an
aria-label
or associating the select with a label improves accessibility for users relying on assistive technologies.Apply this diff to include an accessible label:
<el-select v-model="model" placeholder="Select sub-project" + aria-label="Sub-project" class="w-full" placement="bottom-end" filterable
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-mapping.vue
(1 hunks)frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-repo-item.vue
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-mapping.vue (2)
135-139
: LGTM!
The component definition follows Vue.js best practices.
48-49
:
Add type safety check for organization property.
The v-for
binding assumes repository objects always have an organization, but the type GitHubSettingsRepository
might allow null/undefined organizations. Consider adding a filter or type guard.
-v-for="(repo) of o.repositories"
+v-for="(repo) of o.repositories.filter(r => r.org)"
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
repositories: GitHubSettingsRepository[]; | ||
organizations: GitHubOrganization[]; | ||
mappings: Record<string, string>; | ||
subprojects: any[]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace 'any' type with a proper interface.
Using 'any' type reduces type safety. Consider creating a proper interface for subprojects.
-subprojects: any[];
+interface Subproject {
+ id: string;
+ name: string;
+ // Add other required properties
+}
+
+subprojects: Subproject[];
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
const allOrganizations = computed<any[]>(() => { | ||
const owners = new Set(); | ||
return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: any[], r) => { | ||
if (!owners.has(r.org!.name)) { | ||
owners.add(r.org!.name); | ||
acc.push({ | ||
...(r.org!), | ||
repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org!.url === r.org!.url), | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
return acc; | ||
}, []); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Improve type safety and performance in allOrganizations computed property.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Uses 'any' type in reduce accumulator
- Uses non-null assertions without proper type guards
- Performs unnecessary filtering on each computation
-const allOrganizations = computed<any[]>(() => {
+interface OrganizationWithRepos extends GitHubOrganization {
+ repositories: GitHubSettingsRepository[];
+}
+
+const allOrganizations = computed<OrganizationWithRepos[]>(() => {
const owners = new Set();
- return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: any[], r) => {
- if (!owners.has(r.org!.name)) {
- owners.add(r.org!.name);
+ return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: OrganizationWithRepos[], r) => {
+ if (!r.org?.name || owners.has(r.org.name)) {
+ return acc;
+ }
+ owners.add(r.org.name);
acc.push({
- ...(r.org!),
- repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org!.url === r.org!.url),
+ ...r.org,
+ repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org?.url === r.org.url),
});
- }
return acc;
}, []);
});
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const allOrganizations = computed<any[]>(() => { | |
const owners = new Set(); | |
return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: any[], r) => { | |
if (!owners.has(r.org!.name)) { | |
owners.add(r.org!.name); | |
acc.push({ | |
...(r.org!), | |
repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org!.url === r.org!.url), | |
}); | |
} | |
return acc; | |
}, []); | |
}); | |
interface OrganizationWithRepos extends GitHubOrganization { | |
repositories: GitHubSettingsRepository[]; | |
} | |
const allOrganizations = computed<OrganizationWithRepos[]>(() => { | |
const owners = new Set(); | |
return filteredRepos.value.reduce((acc: OrganizationWithRepos[], r) => { | |
if (!r.org?.name || owners.has(r.org.name)) { | |
return acc; | |
} | |
owners.add(r.org.name); | |
acc.push({ | |
...r.org, | |
repositories: props.repositories.filter((repo) => repo.org?.url === r.org.url), | |
}); | |
return acc; | |
}, []); | |
}); |
model.value = props.subprojects[0].id; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check for empty 'subprojects' array before accessing elements
Accessing props.subprojects[0]
without verifying the array's length can lead to runtime errors if the array is empty.
Apply this diff to add a safety check:
watch(() => model.value, (value) => {
if (!value) {
- model.value = props.subprojects[0].id;
+ if (props.subprojects.length > 0) {
+ model.value = props.subprojects[0].id;
+ } else {
+ model.value = '';
+ }
}
}, { immediate: true });
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ | |||
<template> | |||
<tr class="!border-0"> | |||
<td class="!pb-2.5" :class="ri > 0 ? '!pt-2.5' : '!pt-5'"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Undefined variable 'ri' in template
The variable ri
used in the template is not defined within the component, which will lead to a runtime error.
Apply this diff to correct the issue by defining the variable or using the correct reference:
- <td class="!pb-2.5" :class="ri > 0 ? '!pt-2.5' : '!pt-5'">
+ <td class="!pb-2.5" :class="index > 0 ? '!pt-2.5' : '!pt-5'">
Ensure that index
is properly defined and passed to the component.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-drawer.vue (5)
40-40
: Move inline styles to CSS classThe box-shadow styling should be moved to a CSS class for better maintainability and consistency.
-<div class="border-t border-gray-100 py-5 px-6 flex justify-end gap-4" style="box-shadow: 0 -4px 4px 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)"> +<div class="border-t border-gray-100 py-5 px-6 flex justify-end gap-4 drawer-footer-shadow">Add to your stylesheet:
.drawer-footer-shadow { box-shadow: 0 -4px 4px 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); }
44-50
: Enhance button disabled state validationThe current disabled state only checks for form validation and repositories length. Consider adding loading state handling during the connection process to prevent multiple submissions.
<lf-button type="primary" - :disabled="$v.$invalid || !repositories.length" + :disabled="$v.$invalid || !repositories.length || isConnecting" @click="connect()" > {{ props.integration ? 'Update settings' : 'Connect' }} </lf-button>Add
isConnecting
ref to the setup script:const isConnecting = ref(false);
76-80
: Consider using more specific types for GitHub entitiesThe GitHub-related types could be more specific to improve type safety and maintainability.
- GitHubSettings, GitHubSettingsOrganization, GitHubSettingsRepository, + GitHubSettings, + GitHubSettingsOrganization, + GitHubSettingsRepository, + GitHubApiResponse, // Add this if not existsConsider creating an interface for API responses:
interface GitHubApiResponse { id: string; segmentId: string; status: 'in-progress' | 'connected' | 'failed'; // Add other relevant fields }
105-108
: Initialize state with proper typing and default valuesThe state initialization could be more robust with proper typing and default values.
-const subprojects = ref([]); -const organizations = ref<GitHubOrganization[]>([]); -const repositories = ref<GitHubSettingsRepository[]>([]); -const repoMappings = ref<Record<string, string>>({}); +const subprojects = ref<Array<{ id: string; name: string }>>([]); +const organizations = ref<GitHubOrganization[]>([]); +const repositories = ref<GitHubSettingsRepository[]>([]); +const repoMappings = ref<Record<string, string>>({});
227-229
: Add error handling to mounted hookThe
fetchSubProjects
call inonMounted
should include error handling.onMounted(() => { - fetchSubProjects(); + fetchSubProjects().catch((error) => { + console.error('Error fetching subprojects:', error); + Message.error('Failed to load subprojects'); + }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/config/integrations/github/components/settings/github-settings-drawer.vue
(2 hunks)
const connect = () => { | ||
const data = { ...form.value }; | ||
ConfirmDialog({ | ||
type: 'warning', | ||
title: 'Are you sure you want to proceed?', | ||
message: | ||
'Repository mapping is not reversible. Once GitHub is connected, you wont be able to update these settings.\n\n' | ||
+ 'Reconnecting a different organization and/or repositories won’t remove past activities. ' | ||
+ 'In order to clean up existing data please reach out to our support team.', | ||
confirmButtonText: 'Connect GitHub', | ||
cancelButtonText: 'Cancel', | ||
icon: 'ri-alert-fill', | ||
} as any) | ||
let integration: any = null; | ||
const settings: GitHubSettings = buildSettings(); | ||
(props.integration?.id | ||
? IntegrationService.update(props.integration.id, { settings }) | ||
: IntegrationService.create({ settings, platform: 'github', status: 'in-progress' })) | ||
.then((res) => { | ||
integration = res; | ||
return IntegrationService.githubMapRepos(res.id, repoMappings.value, [res.segmentId]); | ||
}) | ||
.then(() => { | ||
IntegrationService.githubMapRepos(props.integration.id, data, [props.integration.segmentId]) | ||
.then(() => { | ||
isDrawerVisible.value = false; | ||
|
||
doFetch([props.integration.segmentId]); | ||
|
||
trackEvent({ | ||
key: FeatureEventKey.CONNECT_INTEGRATION, | ||
type: EventType.FEATURE, | ||
properties: { | ||
integration: Platform.GITHUB, | ||
}, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
showIntegrationProgressNotification('github', props.integration.segmentId); | ||
|
||
router.push({ | ||
name: 'integration', | ||
params: { | ||
id: props.integration.segmentId, | ||
}, | ||
}); | ||
}) | ||
.catch(() => { | ||
Message.error( | ||
'There was an error mapping github repos', | ||
); | ||
}); | ||
doFetch([integration.segmentId]); | ||
|
||
trackEvent({ | ||
key: FeatureEventKey.CONNECT_INTEGRATION, | ||
type: EventType.FEATURE, | ||
properties: { | ||
integration: Platform.GITHUB, | ||
}, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
if (integration.status === 'in-progress') { | ||
showIntegrationProgressNotification('github', integration.segmentId); | ||
} else { | ||
Message.success(props.integration?.id | ||
? 'Settings have been updated' | ||
: 'GitHub has been connected successfully'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
isDrawerVisible.value = false; | ||
}) | ||
.catch(() => { | ||
Message.error(props.integration?.id | ||
? 'There was error updating settings' | ||
: 'There was error connecting GitHub'); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Improve error handling and type safety in connect method
The connect method could benefit from better error handling and type safety:
- The
integration
variable is typed asany
- Error handling is generic and could be more specific
- Loading state is not managed
+interface ConnectResponse {
+ id: string;
+ segmentId: string;
+ status: 'in-progress' | 'connected' | 'failed';
+}
const connect = () => {
- let integration: any = null;
+ let integration: ConnectResponse | null = null;
+ isConnecting.value = true;
const settings: GitHubSettings = buildSettings();
(props.integration?.id
? IntegrationService.update(props.integration.id, { settings })
: IntegrationService.create({ settings, platform: 'github', status: 'in-progress' }))
.then((res) => {
integration = res;
return IntegrationService.githubMapRepos(res.id, repoMappings.value, [res.segmentId]);
})
.then(() => {
doFetch([integration!.segmentId]);
// ... rest of success handling
})
- .catch(() => {
+ .catch((error: Error) => {
+ console.error('GitHub connection error:', error);
Message.error(props.integration?.id
- ? 'There was error updating settings'
- ? 'There was error connecting GitHub');
+ ? `Error updating settings: ${error.message}`
+ : `Error connecting GitHub: ${error.message}`);
+ })
+ .finally(() => {
+ isConnecting.value = false;
});
};
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github/processData.ts (4)
197-212
: Consider extracting company name parsing logicThe company name parsing logic could be extracted into a separate helper function for better maintainability and reusability.
+const parseCompanyName = (company: string): string => { + return company.replace('@', '').trim() +} if (org && company.length > 0) { - const company = memberData.company.replace('@', '').trim() + const parsedCompany = parseCompanyName(memberData.company) const organizationPayload: IOrganization = { displayName: org.login, // ... rest of the payload }
310-317
: Remove commented-out codeIf this code is no longer needed, it should be removed. If it's intended for future use, please add a TODO comment explaining why it's kept.
Line range hint
682-727
: Consider using a map for event handlersThe switch statement could be replaced with a map of event types to their handlers, making it more maintainable and easier to extend.
+const eventHandlers = new Map<GithubActivityType, ProcessDataHandler>([ + [GithubActivityType.STAR, parseStar], + [GithubActivityType.FORK, parseFork], + // ... other handlers +]); const handler: ProcessDataHandler = async (ctx) => { const data = ctx.data as any const event = data?.type as GithubActivityType if (event) { - switch (event) { - case GithubActivityType.STAR: - await parseStar(ctx) - break - // ... other cases - } + const eventHandler = eventHandlers.get(event); + if (eventHandler) { + await eventHandler(ctx); + } else { + await ctx.abortWithError(`Event not supported '${event}'!`); + } } else { await ctx.abortWithError('No event type found in data!') } }
654-677
: Consider batch processing commits for better performanceThe current implementation processes commits sequentially. Consider batch processing commits to improve performance when handling large push events.
-for (const commit of data.payload.commits) { - const activity: IActivityData = { - // ... activity construction - } - await ctx.publishActivity(activity) -} +const activities = data.payload.commits.map(commit => ({ + channel: apiData.repo.url, + // ... rest of activity construction +})); +await Promise.all(activities.map(activity => ctx.publishActivity(activity)));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github/processData.ts
(15 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
services/libs/integrations/src/integrations/github/processData.ts (2)
4-12
: LGTM! Enhanced type safety with Snowflake types
The addition of proper type definitions from the Snowflake package improves type safety and makes the code more maintainable.
663-671
: Verify if commit attributes are still needed
The commented-out attributes contain valuable metadata about the commit (insertions, deletions, lines changed). Please verify if these attributes are still required for the application's functionality.
Changes proposed ✍️
What
copilot:summary
copilot:poem
Why
How
copilot:walkthrough
Checklist ✅
Feature
,Improvement
, orBug
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SnowflakeClient
andGithubSnowflakeClient
for database interactions.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores