See some examples here: playground
Sifu is a Turing-incomplete programming language based on concatenative pattern matching. It aims to fill a niche for solving problems with finite time/ memory requirements. Any program in Sifu will terminate, making it easier to reason about its effects. This also provides the possibility of proving arbitrary things about programs for safety-critical software, as the halting problem doesn't apply.
-
Computation is an ordered pattern match. Ordering is important, because it ensures there is always a clear path to completion.
-
No turing completeness, everything terminates by matching entries whose index in the map is less than (or recursive/equal, but with structural recursion) until a fixed point (any remaining indices contain no more matches).
-
Everything is a pattern map (like tries, but lookups have to deal with sub-lookups)
-
Core language is pattern-matching rewriter
- pattern entries (
->
) and pattern matches (:
) - keywords are
->
,:
,,
,()
, and{}
- keywords have lower precedence versions:
-->
,::
,;
, - match / set membership / typeof is the same thing (
:
) - source files are just triemaps with entries separated by newlines
- any characters are valid to the parser (punctuation chars are values, like in Forth)
- code can be quoted with backticks (```) like in Lisps, to treat it as data instead of evaluating it.
- values are literals, i.e. upper-case idents, ints, and match only themselves
- vars match anything (lower-case idents)
- pattern entries (
-
Stdlib functions
- multi entries (
=>
) and multi triemap matches (::
). These are implemented by continuously appending a single var match of the current scope until the top of the scope is reached (each key in the pattern is matched)
- multi entries (
-
Values and Variables
- variables are just entries
x -> 2
and match anything - values are as well
Val1 -> 2
and are treated as literals (strings are just an escaped value)
- variables are just entries
-
Emergent Types
- types are triemaps of values
- records are types of types
- record fields are type level entries
- hashmaps of types can be used to implement row types
- type checking is a pattern match
- dependent types are patterns of types with variables
-
Compiler builds on the core language, using it as a library
- complilation is creating perfect hashmaps from dynamic ones
-
Parser/Lexer
- Lexer (Text → Token)
- Parser (Tokens → AST)
- Non-recursive parsing
- Newline delimited apps for top level and operators' rhs
- Nested apps for parentheses
- Patterns
- Infix
- Match
- Arrow
- Syntax
- Apps (parens)
- Patterns (braces)
-
Patterns
- Definition
- Construction (AST → Patterns)
- Error handling
- Matching
- Vals
- Apps
- Vars
- Evaluation
- Index-based limiting
- Multi
-
REPL
- Add entries into a global pattern
- Update entries
- Load files
- REPL specific keywords (delete entry, etc.)
-
Effects / FFI
- Driver API
- Builtin Patterns
- File I/O
-
Basic Stdlib using the Core Language
-
-
Effects / FFI
- Effect analysis
- Tracking
- Propagation
- User error reporting
- Effect analysis
-
Type-checking
-
Codegen
- Perfect Hashmaps / Conversion to switch statements
-
If the ASTs are hashable, why not use a hashmap instead of a trie of tries?
Hashmaps or tries would work for inserting, but granular matching wouldn't. Matching variables would also be tricky to implement.
Thanks to Luukdegram for giving me a starting point with their compiler Luf