The ICLR dataset is a complete scrape of ICLR submissions from OpenReview. It contains 24,445 ICLR submissions from 2017 to 2024.
The dataset is described in González-Márquez & Kobak, Learning representations of learning representations, DMLR workshop at ICLR 2024. Please cite as follows:
@inproceedings{gonzalez2024learning,
title={Learning representations of learning representations},
author={Gonz{\'a}lez-M{\'a}rquez, Rita and Kobak, Dmitry},
booktitle={Data-centric Machine Learning Research (DMLR) workshop at ICLR 2024},
year={2024}
}
Each sample corresponds to a submitted article to the ICLR conference and includes as features:
- Year
- OpenReview ID
- Title
- Abstract
- Authors
- Decision
- Scores
- Keywords
- Labels
To label the dataset, we relied on the author-provided keywords and used them to assign papers to 45 non-overlapping classes. We combined some keywords together into one class (e.g. attention and transformer), disregarded very broad keywords (e.g. deep learning), and assigned papers to rarer classes first. Using this procedure, we ended up labeling 53.4% of all papers.
Note that 26 submissions with placeholder abstracts (below 100 characters) are excluded.
- Dataset: Abstracts submitted to ICLR in 2017-2024 (24,445 papers).
- Labels: based on keywords, 45 classes, 53.4% labeled papers.
- Reviewers: Reviewed papers had on average 3.7 reviews, with 93% having either 3 or 4 reviews.
- Scores: Across all 244,226 possible pairs of reviews of the same paper, the correlation coefficient between scores was 0.40.
- Basic statistics:
We propose to use the ICLR dataset as a benchmark for embedding quality. The ICLR dataset is not part of the training data of many of the existing off-the-shelf models, therefore it makes a good evaluation dataset. We found that on this dataset, bag-of-words representation outperforms most dedicated sentence transformer models in terms of kNN classification accuracy, and the top performing language models barely outperform TF-IDF. We see this as a challenge for the NLP community: to train a language model without using the labels (self-supervised) that produces a sentence embedding that would substantially surpass a naive bag-of-words representation in kNN accuracy.
Model | High-dim. | 2D |
---|---|---|
TF-IDF | 59.2% | 52.0% |
SVD | 58.9% | 55.9% |
SVD, |
60.7% | 56.7% |
SimCSE | 45.1% | 36.3% |
DeCLUTR-sci | 52.7% | 47.1% |
SciNCL | 58.8% | 54.9% |
SPECTER2 | 58.8% | 54.1% |
ST5 | 57.0% | 52.6% |
SBERT | 61.6% | 56.8% |
Cohere v3 | 61.1% | 56.4% |
OpenAI v3 | 62.3% | 57.1% |
Do you want to evaluate your model on the ICLR benchmark? Here is the code for it:
import numpy as np
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_validate
def knn_accuracy_cv(embeddings, labels):
clf = KNeighborsClassifier(
n_neighbors=10, algorithm="brute", n_jobs=-1, metric="euclidean"
)
cvresults = cross_validate(clf, embeddings, labels, cv=10)
knn_accuracy = np.mean(cvresults["test_score"])
return knn_accuracy
# load the dataset
iclr2024 = pd.read_parquet("path/to/file/iclr24v2.parquet")
# substitute for your embeddings
embeddings = TfidfVectorizer(sublinear_tf=True).fit_transform(
iclr2024.abstract.to_list()
)
# compute the knn accuracy
knn_acc = knn_accuracy_cv(
embeddings[iclr2024.labels != "unlabeled"],
iclr2024.labels[iclr2024.labels != "unlabeled"],
)
The dataset will be updated yearly.
Last Updated: 10/2025: added submissions to ICLR 2025 and new labels.
Labels are the same as for the 2024 dataset, except for:
-
class
contrastive learning
andself-supervised learning
have been merged. -
keyword
semantic segmentation
has been added to the classobject detection
. -
keyword
multi-agent
has been added to the classmulti-agent RL
. -
keywords
bert
andtext generation
have been added to the classLLMs
. -
For all keywords where it makes sense, plural has been aded (e.g.
adversarial attack
andadversarial attacks
). -
6 new classes have been added:
safety
with keywordsai safety
andsafety
.alignment
with keywordsalignment
andrlhf
.code generation
with keywordscode generation
andprogram synthesis
.autonomous driving
.knowledge graph
.neuroscience
.