Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update Luxembourg subdivision codes #77

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RJKeevil
Copy link

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Deploy Preview for biter777countries ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 77fb01d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/biter777countries/deploys/66e2d26e3f445c00082a416e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-77--biter777countries.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

@ccoVeille ccoVeille left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While I understand the need to update, I feel strange existing constant are nuked

If they were kept with a deprecated comment, and assigned to the new one with the switch

@RJKeevil
Copy link
Author

Ah didnt realise this was an option, will update

@RJKeevil
Copy link
Author

RJKeevil commented Sep 11, 2024

Hi @ccoVeille, i've updated the PR to put the old codes back in. I couldnt see an obvious way to delegate the old codes to the new ones, so at the moment the list is now the superset of both. Let me know if you want somethng different.

subdivisions.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
subdivisionsconst.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RJKeevil RJKeevil force-pushed the lu-subdivision branch 2 times, most recently from 592980f to fb055b4 Compare September 11, 2024 16:28
@RJKeevil
Copy link
Author

Done, thanks

Copy link

@ccoVeille ccoVeille left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

Let's wait for a maintainer feedback now

@RJKeevil
Copy link
Author

spotted a duplicate in the case statement, fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants