Chore data migration #17
Conversation
jamesthebrooks
force-pushed
the
chore-data-migration
branch
from
a1960c5
to
29325f3
Compare
_data/collections.yaml
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| - label: cloud.gov knowledge base |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can remove this cloud.gov knowledge base config. It is a relic of the Decap CMS that is no longer used in the cloud.gov site.
_data/assetPaths.json
Outdated
| @@ -1,11 +1,26 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm curious -- do we gain anything by having assetPaths checked in? in another project, we're looking at adding it to the gitignore because its so noisy in diffs. If you agree, could you delete it and add it to the ignore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have also been curious about this... Let me get it ignored after the others have been merged. I'll make a note. Do we even need _site at all?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Per Slack discussion, removing "_site" from tracking and adding an issue here for the Pages template: cloud-gov/pages-uswds-11ty#78
_data/collections.yaml
Outdated
| @@ -4,16 +4,53 @@ | |||
| # This is simple, hopefully provides you with a good enough example to make changes as needed | |||
| - name: GSA | |||
| url: https://gsa.gov | |||
| description: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus interdum pellentesque. Integer eu vehicula elit. Sed cursus magna in dui suscipit rhoncus. | |||
| description: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus interdum pellentesque. Integer eu vehicula elit. Sed cursus magna in dui suscipit rhoncus. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what are these descriptions for? do you know? I'm wondering if this is only used in decap.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might even be example data? I honestly don't know and will defer to @apburnes and you.
Changes proposed in this pull request: