Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add jagged-ssh module with support for SSH RSA #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

exceptionfactory
Copy link
Owner

This pull request adds a jagged-ssh module with initial support for the ssh-rsa recipient type.

The SSH RSA implementation uses RSA-OAEP for encrypting File Keys following the design of the agessh package.

The initial implementation requires instances of RSAPublicKey for Recipient Stanza Writers, and instances of RSAPrivateCrtKey for Recipient Stanza Readers.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9c6b873) to head (f18f282).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main        #6   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity       587       587           
===========================================
  Files             90        90           
  Lines           1776      1776           
  Branches         155       155           
===========================================
  Hits            1776      1776           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory merged commit 4104ec1 into main May 30, 2024
5 checks passed
@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory deleted the jagged-ssh-1 branch May 30, 2024 03:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants