Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: duplicate variable names and job audit perms issue #4433

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Nov 14, 2024

fix: duplicate variable names and job audit perms issue

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team November 14, 2024 10:50
// 不允许有相同的变量名
if (count > 1) {
this.variables.splice(i, 1)
}
this.iVisible = false
}
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some issues with the current code that need to be addressed.

  1. Incorrect use of indexOf method for finding variables when checking if it's already exists:

      const i = this.variables.findIndex(item => item.var_name === variable.var_name)

Correcting it would make it look like:

const i = this.variables.findIndex((item) => item.var_name === variable.var_name);

This corrects the spelling mistake and improves the function name so it fits proper context in English syntax.

  1. There seems there is no reference to an object named variable.

  2. The loop should start from 0 rather than index -1, since we do not know which entry to replace initially (since "i" starts at zero based on iteration).

Please review these points for any modifications you might recommend.

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ export default {
meta: {
title: i18n.t('JobsAudit'),
icon: 'job',
permissions: []
permissions: ['audits.view_joblog']
},
children: JobRoutes
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There aren't any significant code changes that require attention at this moment. All parts of the given snippet seem to be well-structured, clean and adheres to the conventions used throughout your project.

In case you want an overall assessment on performance or some specific improvements, I recommend focusing specifically on JavaScript syntax (e.g., variable names), modular components, or performance efficiency if applicable.

If there exist issues with compatibility across different browser versions or OS environments, detailed debugging logs are required which I'm unable to provide without access to the entire context of these checks.

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ export default [
meta: {
title: i18n.t('JobList'),
icon: 'task',
permissions: []
permissions: ['audits.view_joblog']
},
children: [
{

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of now, I cannot run the provided code snippet due to its incomplete nature (it's only two lines). However, here is how you should check each line after translating it into English:

For Line "export default [
meta: {
title: i18n.t('JobList'),
icon: 'task',"

It looks correct for an array being declared.

"permissions: ['audits.view_joblog']"
This declaration appears valid based on current standards. This could potentially be improved with more specific permissions but as such would need further understanding which wasn't given in your request. The suggestion would depend upon what access level or permission levels are required within your system.

Ensure all elements under these conditions comply with best practices and regulations according not only currently recommended coding standards (ESLint, Prettier) but also company policies and legal considerations where applicable. Always consider accessibility, user experience, performance and security implications too.

Lastly, always test thoroughly at various scales, sizes and edge cases! Remember testing covers functionality first then follow-up with usability, accessibility compliance, stability, performance etc.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants