Skip to content

My submission for the first ACM@UCSD AI competition: Hide and Seek

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

kevin-he-01/hide-and-seek-bot

Repository files navigation

Hide and Seek Bot: Clairvoyant

  • 🥉 Third place submission entry to the first AI Competition hosted by ACM@UCSD.
    • Other notable competitors
      1. 🥇 1st place: Joe Cai's "pizza" (not yet open source)
      2. 🥈 2nd place: Jeff Xu's "top ten anime betrayals"
      3. 🥉 3rd place: Kevin He's "clairvoyant" (this bot)
      4. 🎉 4th place: Ishaan Kavoori's "Ultron"
      5. 🎉 5th place: Stone Tao's "breadbot" (the admin bot)
  • Written completely in Python 3 with Python 3.6 type hints, which are removed using strip-hints in the submitted version to be compliant with Python 3.5 on the competition server

Running the bot

To run the bot, make sure you have Python 3 installed (minimum version: 3.6) as well as all necessary requirements to run the competition locally. After that, simply run the following

hide-and-seek ./bot/bot.py ./bot/bot.py

This will allow you to watch the competition live on your terminal.

Naming

The bot is named Clairvoyant because it uses a strategy that uses various information from the server to identify the exact location, or at least one of several possible locations, of each member of the opposing team. This works even if some or all opposing units are out of sight from the owned units. Clairvoyance is the supernatural ability to gain information about a remote target.

How does its clairvoyance work?

The key to its psychic ability lies in the opponent Python module (bot/opponent.py). In this module, opponents are registered as Opponent objects at the start of a match, and the number of opponents is determined by the number of units the bot's team own since the number of units should be the same on both teams. The bot uses the opponents' unit IDs to identify them. From the competition server's source code, I determined that hiders IDs are odd numbers starting from 5 and seeker IDs are even numbers starting from 4. For example, in a 3 seeker and 3 hider map, the seeker IDs are 4, 6, 8 while the hider Ids are 5, 7, 9. The bot tracks all possible map locations of each living opponent in the match based on any units in plain sight and the Euclidean squared distance (R^2) to the closest opposing unit for each unit the agent owns. If there's no possible locations, the opponent is marked as "dead" and removed from the list of opponents. There is a 2D boolean array (Opponent.possibility_map) that is used for this task. Especially in situations where there is only one opponent left, this quickly filters out impossible locations so that the bot can focus on the few possible locations where the opponent can actually be.

Key Insight: All maps are symmetrical

However, using the strategies above alone is not enough to determine opponents' locations. At the start of the game, it seems that hiders can just be anywhere. But after watching a few matches I realized that each map is symmetrical — not just its walls but also the initial location of seekers and hiders. (Relevant code can be found in src/Map/gen.ts line 27 of the competition's repository) This allows the bot to calculate the initial spawning location of each opponent based on the detected symmetry of the map. The bot can even get specific ID numbers corresponding to each opponent location using the fact that <hider ID> = <corresponding seeker ID> + 1 for each symmetrical pair of a seeker and a hider, since the hider is always spawned immediately after the seeker based on the code. With initial locations determined, the bot can often track down the exact location of one of the opponent using the opponent module as described above.

Seeker Strategy

The seeker relies almost exclusively on the "dowsing" ability of the opponent module, and since using opponent alone produced great results, I did not add any algorithms to "search" for the opponent or collaborative strategies (like assigning each seeker to a different search location) Each seeker uses a simple BFS pathing algorithm to find its way to one possible hider location. That is, at each round, it chooses a valid move that would lead to the closest BFS distance to the opponent, and if multiple such moves exist, randomness is used as the tiebreaker when there's multiple possible hider locations, and euclidean (R^2) distance is used when there's only one possible hider location.

Hider Strategy

After implementing my super-seeker, I almost thought that hiders are impossible to win, since there exist an almost perfect strategy for seekers. Also, the game requires the hider to survive for 200 rounds to win, which can be especially hard given the limited map size and the multitude of deadly corners. But it turns out that the hiders may be the one having a perfect strategy, at least in 1 to 1 matches.

Key insight: Looping around wall islands

Seeker 4 tries to tag Hider 5 around a small wall island

Initially, rather than asking myself what the hiders' best strategy is, I begin by asking what the worst situation is for a hider. Obviously, it would be to get stuck in a corner or dead end while being chased by seekers. So the best hiding location would avoid this situation to the greatest possible extent. If the paths present in the game maps are roads, then each road must either have dead ends or be a loop. And given that fact that hiders and seekers move at the same speed when traveling through the same path, a seeker can never tag a hider when chasing it around a loop. In order for this strategy to work, it is important that the loop path be as tight as possible around a wall, so that the seeker cannot take shortcuts to get closer to the hider. To implement this strategy, the hider code scans the map at the start of each match for wall islands (consecutive wall areas where each wall cell is adjacently connected to any other wall cell, and that only orthogonal connections are allowed) and try to find the tightest loop around them through an algorithm to find its octagonal convex hull, it then filters them based on whether it is possible for it to reach some point on the loop before the seeker did. It then randomly chooses a hiding location on a loop and moves toward it.

Possible Improvements

The hider strategy seems incomplete since I don't have the time by the July 6th deadline to implement more advanced strategies. I was trying to find a better technique than the octagonal convex hull method to find the minimum loop path around a wall, especially when the a side of the convex hull intersects other walls. In addition, the strategy works poorly when there are multiple seekers. Furthermore, the hider doesn't prefer locations with better visibility of seekers and sometimes the seeker tags it before it can even see the seeker for very small loops.

Tools and Testing tricks

Logging

I implemented my own logging system (not using Python's logging module) to facilitate testing of bots and ensure that the submitted code is "relatively" bug-free. After implementing each major function or module, I have to make sure that it works as expected before I add more code that depends on it. However, the competition system makes it very hard to log output. It seems that at least for Python bots, stdout and stderr are both redirected to the hide and seek server and is usually not revealed. Indeed, it was not until days before the deadline that the hide-and-seek-ai npm package was updated to even allow viewing the bot's error message when it crashes with an exception (This is quite understandable given that it is ACM@UCSD's first attempt in making an AI competition). But prior to that, the logging system was created to deal with the frustration of not knowing what went wrong when the game map freezes. The initial logging system simply wrapped the game loop inside a try ... except Exception: statement that captures all errors (except exceptions directly derived from BaseException like SystemExit, which are generally a bad idea to catch) and logged any exception tracebacks to a file. Later, logging started encompassing all forms of information in addition to errors (Ex. debug information) It later got more advanced with time tracking, separate logs files for hiders and seekers, and more.

Shell scripts to clear/save logs

It was very annoying to have logs for the previous match persist after the match ended, so voilà clear-bot-logs.sh was born. In addition, I want to be able to save logs that can help in debugging later on (Ex. determining whether somethings breaks after I introduce a change to the code), so I created archive-bot-logs.sh for this.

Using human to control an agent

You may have noticed that there is a Python script named control-server.py and human.py, and none of them are included in the submitted zip file

To facilitate testing of one team side (hider or seeker) even when the code for the opposing team side is not complete, I created a curses-based control server that binds itself to localhost:9009. A server is necessary since the bot process cannot communicate with the outside through standard streams. Both stdin and stdout are used to communicate with the hide nad seek game.

Submitting

To create a zip file for the code (for submission purposes), make sure to set submit to True in bot/bot.py so that for example, it will not log errors to files when running on the competition server. Then make sure you have strip-hints installed from pip. If not, run:

pip install strip-hints

After that, run

make submit

Note: If you successfully installed strip-hints, but the script still shows strip-hints: command not found, you may need to reopen the terminal or even log out of your Linux/Unix user account and log back in to refresh your .profile and add the directory containing strip-hints to your PATH environment variable.

If make runs successfully, you should then find bot.zip under out/, which can then be uploaded to the competition website with bot.py (the main file for the bot) entered into the "Bot Path" field.