Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: leverage the threshold for nzeta_infer #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kirk0830
Copy link
Owner

@kirk0830 kirk0830 commented Oct 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new analysis method for wave function coefficients, enhancing data visualization and analysis capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated singular value counting logic for improved accuracy in orbital optimization results.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two files. In api.py, the _nzeta_infer function's implementation of the _svd_kernel function is updated to count singular values greater than or equal to 1.0 instead of 1e-2, impacting nzeta calculations. In lcao_wfc_analysis.py, a new method est_single_case is added to the TestLCAOWfcAnalysis class, which analyzes wave function coefficients and visualizes results using Matplotlib. Minor comment and formatting adjustments were also made.

Changes

File Change Summary
SIAB/spillage/api.py Modified _nzeta_infer to count singular values >= 1.0 instead of 1e-2. Minor comment adjustments.
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Added est_single_case method to TestLCAOWfcAnalysis for analyzing and plotting wave function coefficients.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the realm of numbers, we take a leap,
Counting singular values, our data to keep.
With plots that dance on the y-axis bright,
We analyze waves, bringing knowledge to light.
A tweak here, a change there, all in good cheer,
For in the world of science, progress is near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py (1)

387-415: Overall assessment: Refactor for improved modularity and flexibility.

The new est_single_case method provides valuable functionality for analyzing and visualizing wave function coefficients. However, there are several opportunities for improvement:

  1. Parameterize input paths for better flexibility.
  2. Separate data processing from visualization logic.
  3. Improve error handling for file operations.
  4. Refactor nested loops into smaller, more focused methods.
  5. Add options for saving plots in addition to displaying them.

These changes will enhance the method's reusability, maintainability, and overall code quality. Consider implementing the suggested refactorings to address these points.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

396-396: Local variable sigmas is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable sigmas

(F841)


400-400: Loop control variable nt not used within loop body

Rename unused nt to _nt

(B007)


401-401: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 535b1bd and 0a85793.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • SIAB/spillage/api.py (1 hunks)
  • SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py

396-396: Local variable sigmas is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable sigmas

(F841)


400-400: Loop control variable nt not used within loop body

Rename unused nt to _nt

(B007)


401-401: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
SIAB/spillage/api.py (1)

685-686: ⚠️ Potential issue

Significant change in SVD threshold for nzeta inference.

The threshold for counting singular values has been increased from 1e-2 to 1.0, with an additional small value of 1.0e-6 added for numerical stability. This change will likely result in fewer singular values being counted, potentially leading to a different nzeta inference.

To assess the impact of this change, please run the following verification script:

Consider adding unit tests to validate the new behavior and ensure it aligns with the expected outcomes for orbital optimization.

✅ Verification successful

Unit tests for _nzeta_infer are present and cover the changes.

The existing unit tests for _nzeta_infer function effectively validate its behavior. The alteration of the SVD threshold from 1e-2 to 1.0 and the addition of 1.0e-6 for numerical stability are adequately tested, ensuring consistent and reliable nzeta inference in the orbital optimization process.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare nzeta inference results before and after the change

# Test: Search for usage of _nzeta_infer function
rg --type python -A 10 '_nzeta_infer'

# Test: Check for any existing unit tests related to nzeta inference
rg --type python 'def test.*nzeta.*infer'

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare nzeta inference results before and after the change

# Test: Search for usage of _nzeta_infer function
rg --type py -A 10 '_nzeta_infer'

# Test: Check for any existing unit tests related to nzeta inference
rg --type py 'def test.*nzeta.*infer'

Length of output: 4681

SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@kirk0830 kirk0830 merged commit 960ec26 into main Oct 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@kirk0830 kirk0830 deleted the change-svd-thr branch October 10, 2024 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant