Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: seperate the coef_opt task into jy and pw #93

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

kirk0830
Copy link
Owner

@kirk0830 kirk0830 commented Sep 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new command to execute the orbital optimization script with verbose output.
    • Introduced new functions for improved orbital coefficient optimization, enhancing modularity and clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated test cases to align with new function signatures and logic.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured optimization logic for better maintainability and separation of concerns.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the .github/tests/xtest.sh script and the SIAB/spillage/api.py file. A new command has been added to the test script to execute the api.py script with verbose output. The api.py file has undergone significant restructuring, introducing new functions for orbital coefficient optimization, enhancing modularity, and refining the overall logic. Additionally, the function signatures have been updated to accommodate these changes, and new helper functions have been added to improve clarity and maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/tests/xtest.sh Added a command to execute python3 ./SIAB/spillage/api.py -v for verbose output.
SIAB/spillage/api.py Refactored the orbital coefficient optimization process, introducing _coef_opt_jy, _coef_opt_pw, and _coef_opt_env_init. Updated _coef_guess to accept a dictionary. Split _nzeta_infer into two functions. Updated test cases accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TestScript as xtest.sh
    participant API as api.py

    User->>TestScript: Execute test
    TestScript->>API: Run api.py with -v flag
    API->>API: Initialize environment
    API->>API: Optimize coefficients (jY or pw)
    API-->>TestScript: Return results
    TestScript-->>User: Display results
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
With functions refactored, oh what a sight!
New paths for optimization, clear as the day,
A hop and a skip, let the bugs go away!
With tests now in place, we dance with delight,
For every small change brings joy to our byte! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/tests/xtest.sh (1)

Line range hint 1-17: Consider enhancing the script with error handling and performance improvements.

While the current implementation is straightforward, consider the following enhancements:

  1. Add basic error handling to identify which script fails if an error occurs.
  2. Implement output management to make it easier to analyze the results.
  3. Consider adding an option for parallel execution to improve performance, especially useful when the number of scripts grows.

Here's a suggested implementation incorporating these improvements:

#!/usr/bin/bash

# Function to run a single Python script
run_script() {
    echo "Running $1..."
    if ! python3 "$1" -v > "$1.log" 2>&1; then
        echo "Error running $1. Check $1.log for details."
        return 1
    fi
}

# List of scripts to run
scripts=(
    "./SIAB/spillage/basistrans.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/datparse.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/index.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/inputio.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/jlzeros.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/linalg_helper.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/listmanip.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/orbio.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/orbscreen.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/radial.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/spillage.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/struio.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/lcao_wfc_analysis.py"
    "./SIAB/spillage/api.py"
)

# Check for parallel execution flag
if [ "$1" == "--parallel" ]; then
    echo "Running scripts in parallel..."
    for script in "${scripts[@]}"; do
        run_script "$script" &
    done
    wait
else
    echo "Running scripts sequentially..."
    for script in "${scripts[@]}"; do
        run_script "$script" || exit 1
    done
fi

echo "All scripts completed. Check individual .log files for detailed output."

This implementation:

  1. Uses a function to run each script, capturing output and errors in separate log files.
  2. Allows for easy addition or removal of scripts from the list.
  3. Provides an option for parallel execution with the --parallel flag.
  4. Stops execution on the first error in sequential mode, but runs all scripts in parallel mode.

To use parallel execution, run the script with ./xtest.sh --parallel.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f27592e and 72ab66d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/tests/xtest.sh (1 hunks)
  • SIAB/spillage/api.py (11 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
SIAB/spillage/api.py

268-268: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


296-296: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


855-855: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
SIAB/spillage/api.py (3)

855-855: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove the unnecessary f prefix from the string.

The string in the os.path.join function does not contain any placeholders, so the f prefix is not needed. This can cause confusion and should be removed.

-running = read_running_scf_log(os.path.join(outdir, f"running_{params.get('calculation', 'scf')}.log"))
+running = read_running_scf_log(os.path.join(outdir, "running_{params.get('calculation', 'scf')}.log"))

Alternatively, if the intention was to include the value of params.get('calculation', 'scf') in the filename, ensure that the f prefix is used correctly:

running = read_running_scf_log(os.path.join(outdir, f"running_{params.get('calculation', 'scf')}.log"))

If params.get('calculation', 'scf') should not be treated as a string literal, the f prefix is appropriate.

Please confirm whether the placeholder is intended in the string. If so, the f prefix is correct, and no changes are needed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

855-855: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


476-476: ⚠️ Potential issue

Rename the iter function to avoid shadowing built-in names.

Naming a function iter shadows the built-in iter() function in Python, which can lead to unexpected behavior or confusion. It is advisable to use a different function name that reflects its purpose more precisely.

Consider renaming the function to something like iterate_rcuts, process_iterations, or run_optimization.

-def iter(siab_settings: dict, calculation_settings: list, folders: list):
+def run_optimization(siab_settings: dict, calculation_settings: list, folders: list):

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


554-555: Ensure correct aggregation of nzeta values.

In the calculation of the average nzeta, the resizing and addition of arrays may lead to incorrect values if the shapes do not match as expected. Verify that the aggregation correctly averages the nzeta values over all folders.

Run the following script to check the aggregation logic:

Ensure that the outputted nzeta values are correctly combined and averaged in the main function.

.github/tests/xtest.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
SIAB/spillage/api.py (11)

52-77: LGTM! New function improves modularity.

The addition of _coef_opt_env_init function enhances the code's modularity by separating the initialization logic for the optimization environment. This is a good practice for maintainability.

Consider enhancing the docstring by providing more details about the return value:

def _coef_opt_env_init(siab_settings: dict, folders: list):
    """
    Initialize the optimization environment for orbital coefficient optimization.

    Parameters
    ----------
    siab_settings: dict
        The settings for SIAB optimization, including orbital parameters.
    folders: list
        The folders where the ABACUS run information are stored.

    Returns
    -------
    list[list[list[int]]]
        A nested list structure where:
        - The outer list represents different orbitals.
        - The middle list represents different folders or configurations.
        - The innermost list contains the band indexes for each configuration.
    """

79-147: LGTM! New function improves separation of concerns.

The addition of _coef_opt_jy function enhances the code structure by separating the jy-specific optimization logic. This improves readability and maintainability.

Consider adding error handling for the case when no valid folders are found:

configs = list(set([folder for f in configs for folder in f]))
if not configs:
    raise ValueError("No valid configuration folders found.")

This will provide a more informative error message if the input folders are invalid or empty.


149-219: LGTM! New function handles pw-specific optimization.

The addition of _coef_opt_pw function improves the code structure by separating the pw-specific optimization logic. This enhances modularity and maintainability.

For consistency with _coef_opt_jy, consider adding error handling for the case when no valid folders are found:

configs = list(set([folder for f in configs for folder in f]))
if not configs:
    raise ValueError("No valid configuration folders found.")

Also, consider adding a comment explaining why nzeta is not inferred in this function, unlike in _coef_opt_jy.


221-251: LGTM! Function refactored for improved flexibility.

The changes to _initguess function enhance its flexibility and usability. The new dictionary return value improves readability and makes it easier to extend the function in the future.

Consider adding type hints to the function signature for improved code clarity:

def _initguess(nzeta: List[List[int]], 
               folder: str, 
               jy: bool = True, 
               diagnosis: bool = True) -> Dict[str, Union[List[int], bool, str]]:

Don't forget to import the necessary types from the typing module.


253-304: LGTM! New function implements hierarchical optimization.

The addition of _do_onion_opt function is a significant improvement, implementing a sophisticated hierarchical optimization strategy. The code is well-structured and commented, enhancing maintainability.

To improve readability, consider using tuple unpacking in the for loop:

for iorb, (index_, nzeta_, iconfs_, ibands_) in enumerate(zip(deps, nzeta, iconfs, ibands)):

This eliminates the need for separate indexing and makes the code more concise.


306-328: LGTM! Function refactored for improved modularity.

The changes to _coef_opt function enhance its flexibility by handling both jy and pw cases. The delegation to specific functions improves code modularity and maintainability.

Consider adding a check for unsupported basis types:

def _coef_opt(rcut: float, siab_settings: dict, folders: list, jy: bool = False):
    if jy:
        call = _coef_opt_jy
    elif not jy:
        call = _coef_opt_pw
    else:
        raise ValueError(f"Unsupported basis type: {jy}")
    
    # ... rest of the function

This will provide a more informative error message if an unsupported basis type is passed.


Line range hint 603-635: LGTM! New function improves nzeta inference.

The addition of _nzeta_mean_conf function is a significant improvement, implementing a sophisticated strategy for inferring nzeta values across multiple configurations. The code is well-structured and commented, enhancing maintainability.

To improve robustness, consider adding a check for empty folders:

def _nzeta_mean_conf(nbands, folders):
    # ... existing code ...
    
    if not folders:
        raise ValueError("No folders provided for nzeta inference.")
    
    nzeta = np.array([0])
    # ... rest of the function

This will prevent potential issues if an empty list of folders is passed to the function.


637-687: LGTM! New function provides detailed nzeta inference.

The addition of _nzeta_infer function is a valuable improvement, implementing a detailed process for inferring nzeta values from a single structure. The code is well-structured and commented, enhancing maintainability.

Consider adding error handling for file reading operations:

try:
    params = read_input_script(os.path.join(folder, "INPUT"))
    running = read_running_scf_log(os.path.join(outdir, 
                                                f"running_{params.get('calculation', 'scf')}.log"))
    # ... other file reading operations ...
except FileNotFoundError as e:
    raise ValueError(f"Required file not found: {e.filename}")

This will provide more informative error messages if required files are missing.


689-713: LGTM! New function implements wll matrix folding.

The addition of _wll_fold function is a useful improvement, implementing a specific strategy for folding the wll matrix. The code is concise and focused, enhancing modularity.

To improve code clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the folding strategy:

def _wll_fold(wll, nband):
    # ... existing code ...
    
    for ib in nband:
        wlb = np.sum(wll[ib].real, 1)
        # Fold by dividing by the degeneracy of each angular momentum
        wll_fold += wlb / degen
    
    return wll_fold

This comment helps readers understand the purpose of the division by degen.


Line range hint 715-758: LGTM! New function provides detailed nzeta analysis.

The addition of _nzeta_analysis function is a valuable improvement, implementing a detailed process for analyzing nzeta values from the initial guess. The code is well-structured and commented, enhancing maintainability.

Consider adding a check for valid lmaxmax values:

lmaxmax = len(running["nzeta"][itype]) - 1
if lmaxmax < 0:
    raise ValueError(f"Invalid lmaxmax value: {lmaxmax}. Check the 'nzeta' data in the running log.")

This will prevent potential issues if the nzeta data in the running log is unexpected or invalid.


Line range hint 760-1195: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage added.

The addition of the TestAPI class significantly improves the test coverage of the module. The test cases cover various scenarios and edge cases, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability of the code.

To improve the readability and maintainability of the test class, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Split long test methods into smaller, more focused tests. For example, test_orb_matrices could be split into separate tests for old and new file formats.

  2. Use setup and teardown methods to reduce code duplication. For example:

def setUp(self):
    self.test_folder = "test_orb_matrices"
    os.makedirs(self.test_folder, exist_ok=True)

def tearDown(self):
    shutil.rmtree(self.test_folder)
  1. Use parameterized tests for similar test cases with different inputs. For example, in test_nzeta_mean_conf:
@parameterized.expand([
    (4, [1, 1, 0]),
    (5, [2, 1, 0]),
    (10, [2, 1, 1]),
])
def test_nzeta_mean_conf_monomer_gamma(self, nbands, expected):
    fpath = os.path.join(self.here, "testfiles/Si/jy-7au/monomer-gamma/")
    folders = [fpath]
    nzeta = _nzeta_mean_conf(nbands, folders)
    nzeta = [int(np.round(nz)) for nz in nzeta]
    self.assertEqual(nzeta, expected)

These changes will make the tests more modular, easier to maintain, and simpler to extend in the future.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

934-934: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72ab66d and 246542b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • SIAB/spillage/api.py (12 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
SIAB/spillage/api.py

347-347: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


375-375: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


934-934: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
SIAB/spillage/api.py (1)

Line range hint 1-1195: Overall, excellent refactoring and improvements!

The changes in this file represent a significant enhancement to the codebase:

  1. Improved modularity with the introduction of separate functions for jy and pw basis optimizations.
  2. Enhanced flexibility in handling different configurations and basis types.
  3. Addition of new utility functions for nzeta inference and analysis.
  4. Comprehensive test coverage with the new TestAPI class.

These changes will greatly improve the maintainability, readability, and reliability of the code. The separation of concerns and the addition of detailed comments make the code easier to understand and modify in the future.

While minor suggestions have been made in previous comments, there are no major issues left unaddressed. Great work on this refactoring effort!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

347-347: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


375-375: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)

SIAB/spillage/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant