Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update unittest.yaml #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

update unittest.yaml #94

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

kirk0830
Copy link
Owner

@kirk0830 kirk0830 commented Sep 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on pushes to the main branch and for pull requests targeting the main branch, enhancing clarity and ensuring proper workflow execution.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made involve updating the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the .github/workflows/unittest.yaml file. The workflow is now set to trigger on pushes to the main branch and for pull requests targeting the same branch. This ensures that the workflow runs for relevant changes, clarifying the conditions under which it is activated.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/unittest.yaml Updated event triggers to include pushes to the main branch and specified pull_request for main.

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
The rabbit hops, dispelling gloom.
With triggers set, the tests will run,
On main we push, oh what fun!
Each pull request, a dance so bright,
In the workflow's embrace, all feels right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/unittest.yaml (2)

4-9: LGTM! Consider adding protection for the main branch.

The changes to the workflow triggers look good. Adding the push event for the main branch ensures that tests run on direct pushes, while specifying the main branch for pull requests provides clarity and potentially reduces unnecessary workflow runs.

To further enhance your CI/CD process, consider the following suggestion:

  1. If not already in place, set up branch protection rules for the main branch to prevent direct pushes and require pull requests with passing status checks before merging. This practice ensures that all changes to the main branch go through the CI pipeline and code review process.

You can set this up in your repository settings under "Branches" > "Branch protection rules".


Line range hint 1-43: General suggestions for workflow improvements

While not directly related to the changes in this PR, here are some suggestions to further enhance your workflow:

  1. Consider adding a step to cache dependencies (both conda and pip) to speed up subsequent runs.
  2. It's a good practice to pin exact versions of GitHub Actions (e.g., actions/checkout@v4.1.1 instead of actions/checkout@v4) for better reproducibility.
  3. You might want to add a step to upload test results as artifacts, which can be helpful for debugging failed runs.

Here's an example of how you could implement dependency caching:

- uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: ~/.conda/pkgs
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-conda-${{ hashFiles('environment.yml') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-conda-

- uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: ~/.cache/pip
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-pip-${{ hashFiles('**/requirements.txt') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-pip-

Add these steps before the "Install prerequisite by conda" step.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f27592e and 0fc00d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/unittest.yaml (1 hunks)

@kirk0830 kirk0830 merged commit ce4cb57 into main Sep 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@kirk0830 kirk0830 deleted the kirk0830-patch-1 branch September 27, 2024 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant