Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix kind version unit test failures for released versions #3599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

hp685
Copy link
Contributor

@hp685 hp685 commented May 1, 2024

Version() string assumes that preRelease version is set for commit hash and count to be taken into account. Update the unit tests to pass in a pre release version per test case

Version() string assumes that preRelease version is set for commit hash
and count to be taken into account. Update the unit tests to pass in a
pre release version per test case
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @hp685!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kind 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kind has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hp685. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 1, 2024
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

fix kind version unit test failures on non-main branches

We don't have or support any branch other than main ...?

Can you explain in more detail what you're attempting to fix?

@hp685
Copy link
Contributor Author

hp685 commented May 1, 2024

fix kind version unit test failures on non-main branches

We don't have or support any branch other than main ...?

Can you explain in more detail what you're attempting to fix?

Updated the title. Here's what I meant:

the version unit tests fail for any released artifacts since the versionPreRelease is "" after the release. Any downstreams that rely on building and testing a released version would encounter this failure

@hp685 hp685 changed the title fix kind version unit test failures on non-main branches fix kind version unit test failures for released versions May 1, 2024
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

Ah -- That's an interesting gap. Our release process creates a new pre-release commit immediately following the release tag commit so we're never testing that commit alone.

Copy link
Member

@BenTheElder BenTheElder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, hp685

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hp685: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-29 4b69508 link true /test pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-29
pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-28 4b69508 link true /test pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-28

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hp685
Copy link
Contributor Author

hp685 commented May 1, 2024

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hp685: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hp685
Copy link
Contributor Author

hp685 commented May 2, 2024

Looking at the logs for the e2e jobs the timeout failure doesn't seem relevant to this change

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

correct

@BenTheElder BenTheElder merged commit 19df3db into kubernetes-sigs:main May 2, 2024
26 of 29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants