Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QScintilla (GPL) and ScintillaEdit (MIT) support #44

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mappu
Copy link
Owner

@mappu mappu commented Oct 16, 2024

Updates: #5

Updates: #45

Requires: #47

Adds bindings for QScintilla. This library is GPL/Commercial only ⚠️ and is put in a new restricted-extras section.

Adds bindings for ScintillaEdit (MIT).

Screenshots:

@mappu mappu marked this pull request as draft October 16, 2024 06:16
@jamalsa
Copy link

jamalsa commented Oct 17, 2024

I'm not an expert on Qt or C++, but is there any chance for the binding to use Scintilla component (https://www.scintilla.org) which has permissive license directly? I noticed in their source there are Qt components (ScintillaEditBase and ScintillaEdit).

@mappu
Copy link
Owner Author

mappu commented Oct 18, 2024

@jamalsa That's really interesting, thank you for pointing it out. ScintillaEdit builds cleanly for me, it seems like a less featureful binding than QScintilla (no signals at all) but the license is definitely preferable.

Let's add both,

@mappu mappu changed the title QScintilla support QScintilla (GPL) and ScintillaEdit (MIT) support Oct 18, 2024
@mappu mappu force-pushed the miqt-scintilla branch 2 times, most recently from 9fbb694 to 04766c5 Compare October 19, 2024 02:08
@mappu mappu marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2024 02:09
@mappu mappu merged commit e543587 into master Oct 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@mappu mappu deleted the miqt-scintilla branch October 20, 2024 05:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants