Update cloudinary 2.0.2 → 2.1.1 (minor) #3405
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![depfu[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/715?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ cloudinary (2.0.2 → 2.1.1) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
2.1.1
2.1.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 8 commits:
Version 2.1.1Fix regression in `cloudinary_url` generationVersion 2.1.0Add support for `rename_folder` Admin APIFix detection of base64 encoded files with complex MIME typeAdd support for `delete_access_key` in Provisioning APIFix `fetch` url generation with Active Storage `folder` configurationFix usage of deprecated `File.exists?` methodRelease Notes
2.9.1
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 15 commits:
Add Bundler::GemHelper tasks to RakefileAdd missing bundle install to publish.ymlVersion bump to 2.9.1Support default json decoder even when nil responds to `:load` (#1563)Add `TooManyRequestsError` (429) to error docs (#1565)Fix compatibility with Ruby 3.4.0-preview1 (#1560)Fix Rubocop errorsMake dig method case-insensitive in Faraday::Utils::HeadersLint fixUse Rubygems Trusted Publishers to publish. (#1552)Update rack requirement from ~> 2.2 to ~> 3.0 (#1549)Remove unnecessary rubocop disable comments. (#1551)docs: update `body` param type for `run_request` (#1545)Add RuboCop disablesadd bundler config to dependabotDepfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands