-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable Webhooks #466
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Disable Webhooks #466
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bshephar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/e6ee4d6e038742faa0358b058025f546 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 01m 08s |
Yeah, so as we discussed on the call. This will break Kuttl tests. So we need to be able to dynamically set this for CI jobs - which is ideal since we do want to test web hooks in CI. But, ultimately, the bundle we build and ship should have the service level operator web hooks disabled so that they can be executed by the openstack-operator without duplication.
|
/test heat-operator-build-deploy-kuttl |
d0d9edc
to
b0c5b47
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/cc47398324ea43fc8a7863f7cafc5c82 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 26m 45s |
b0c5b47
to
b4a76f5
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/9ac36f3b6ba341e6abf8a2fc21672ca7 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 25m 40s |
We need to merge this one to proceed any further here: |
/test heat-operator-build-deploy-kuttl |
e9c55e2
to
cff9550
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/589eadecd7fc49e2b4cd73a423f7c1f9 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 25m 16s |
cff9550
to
cf3f2de
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/efff7273a75442b0941b043ecbe08afb ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 49m 58s |
This change builds the Operator bundle with ENABLE_WEBHOOKS=false. This is due to the duplication of webhook logic since openstack-operator imports and runs this webhook at the OpenStackControlPlane level. Therefor, having the webhook run by the service operator is a needless duplication of this webhook logic. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11198 Signed-off-by: Brendan Shephard <bshephar@redhat.com>
cf3f2de
to
a0bd52f
Compare
@bshephar: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/1dfbed4e2db6453e9a382f5526c704d4 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 54m 15s |
This change builds the Operator bundle with ENABLE_WEBHOOKS=false. This is due to the duplication of webhook logic since openstack-operator imports and runs this webhook at the OpenStackControlPlane level. Therefor, having the webhook run by the service operator is a needless duplication of this webhook logic.
Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11198