-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/rails 5.2 #3352
Feature/rails 5.2 #3352
Conversation
3a1b9a9
to
d20c92f
Compare
Could you help me to find why we have this error?
Also, should we support Rails 5.1 and 5.2 on Refinery 4.1? Drop support of Rails 5.1 for Refinery 4.1? Start using Appraisal gem or wait for a request from the community? |
d20c92f
to
ee0b74b
Compare
core/refinerycms-core.gemspec
Outdated
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
require File.expand_path('../../core/lib/refinery/version', __FILE__) | |||
|
|||
version = Refinery::Version.to_s | |||
rails_version = ['>= 5.1.0', '< 5.2'] | |||
rails_version = ['>= 5.2.0.rc1', '< 6'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems like this could stay at >= 5.1.0
and you could specify the rc1 in the Gemfile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this time the only breaking change between Rails 5.1 and 5.2 is this : 70cd41c
So i'm ok to do what to say.
Any thoughts for this last remaining error undefined method
except!' for nil:NilClass` ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh it looks like it's a rails 5.2.0.rc1
bug, mobility
gem has also this kind of problem:
shioyama/mobility#164
rails/rails@5fcbdcf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems like it might be addressed in the next rc
ee0b74b
to
b340b26
Compare
Now use successful?
We don't use it for now
b340b26
to
0a6ac9a
Compare
FWIW, released Mobility 0.5.1 with a fix for 5.2.0.rc2. The problematic change in rc1 was reverted. |
Thanks @shioyama !! |
046265e
to
164c441
Compare
265f5a9
to
96fb8bf
Compare
96fb8bf
to
decce15
Compare
@parndt ready to merge? |
🆙 @parndt 🙃 |
Sorry sir... When can I use this for Rails 5.2 :( |
@bricesanchez But... What about 'refinerycms-authentication-devise' and 'refinerycms-inquiries' ? Because when I update rails and refinerycms, it has a bit of a conflict. |
@ttmthanh You could use the master branch for For |
@bricesanchez Please help me ask him :D Thank you very much 👍 😞 |
It's already asked :) |
|
@bricesanchez Sorry sir... Please help me if you are free.. |
@ttmthanh I merged it.. |
@parndt Thanks so much... Because I am trying to use the Active storage service (Rails 5.2) combined with refinerycms.. |
@parndt refinery/refinerycms-page-images#151 Sorry sir... |
Nice! We just merged a bugfix with ActiveStorage and Refinery #3385
You will have to use the |
We support Rails 5.2, we need to have a green build to merge this PR.
We will have to wait for rails 5.2.0.rc2, see: #3352 (comment)
[UPDATE 2018/06/02]: